INFORMATION Archives - Page 61 of 82 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
211
archive,paged,category,category-information,category-211,paged-61,category-paged-61,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.4.7,vc_responsive
 

INFORMATION

T.C. SUPREME COURT 8.law office Base : 2014/21867 Decision: 2016/10043 Date of Decision: 08.06.2016 FORTIFICATION CASE – WHERE THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OR RIGHT CARRIED OUT BY THE DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COURT IS REQUIRED TO EXCEED THE SPECIFIED AMOUNT – APPROVAL OF THE PROVISION ABSTRACT: In order to conduct...

T.C. SUPREME COURT 1.law office Base: 2014/16696 Decision: 2016/5804 Date of Decision: 10.09.2016 CASE OF CANCELLATION AND REGISTRATION OF TITLE DEEDS – THERE IS NO INACCURACY IN THE DISCRETION OF THE EVIDENCE ON THE LEGAL AND JURIDICAL GROUNDS ON WHICH THE PROVISION IS BASED – APPROVAL OF THE PROVISION ABSTRACT: In...

T.C. SUPREME COURT 8.Criminal Department Base: 2016/7247 Decision: 2016/8702 Date of Decision: 30.06.2016 CRIME OF ARMS TRADE – IT WAS FOUND THAT PISTOL PICTURES WERE SENT FROM THE DEFENDANT'S PHONE TO THE PHONE NUMBER IN QUESTION, THIS ISSUE WAS NOT INVESTIGATED – VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION SUMMARY: During the examination of...

T.C. SUPREME COURT 15.law office Main: 2016/891 Decision: 2016/3775 Date of Decision: 30.06.2016 THE CASE ARISING FROM THE WORK CONTRACT – AN ADDITIONAL REPORT SUITABLE FOR SENTENCING AND SUPREME COURT SUPERVISION IS RECEIVED AND THE RESULT IS DECIDED ACCORDINGLY – THE DECISION IS MADE BY INCOMPLETE EXAMINATION – SUMMARY: a commission...

T.C. SUPREME COURT 11.law office Base: 2015/11329 Decision: 2016/6923 Date of Decision: 22.06.2016 CASE OF COMPENSATION – THERE IS NO INACCURACY IN THE DISCRETION OF THE EVIDENCE – THE DEFENDANT'S DEPUTY FERI ALL APPEALS OF THE INTERVENING DEPUTY ARE OUT OF PLACE – CONFIRMATION OF THE VERDICT ABSTRACT: According to the...

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran