INFORMATION Archives - Page 35 of 81 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
211
archive,paged,category,category-information,category-211,paged-35,category-paged-35,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.4.7,vc_responsive
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
7.Criminal Department
Base: 2014/29494
Decision: 2016/9095
Date of Decision: 30.06.2016
OPPOSITION CRIME NO. 4733 – SINCE IT IS CONSIDERED SUFFICIENT THAT THE ACT WAS COMMITTED BY TWO PEOPLE IN TERMS OF THE OCCURRENCE OF A MASS SMUGGLING CRIME, THE DEFENDANTS' SENTENCES SHOULD BE...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
3.Criminal Department
Base: 2016/11885
Decision: 2016/15033
Date of Decision: 28.06.2016
INTENTIONAL INJURY CRIME – THE DEFENDANT WHO IS UNDERSTOOD NOT TO HAVE COMPLETED THE AGE OF FIFTEEN AT THE TIME OF THE CRIME - ALTHOUGH A DISCOUNT SHOULD BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
3.Criminal Department
Base: 2015/34137
Decision: 2016/15145
Date of Decision: 28.06.2016
SIMPLE INJURY OFFENSE – THE NEED TO APPLY A MINIMUM REDUCTION IN THE DEFENDANT'S SENTENCE – INCOMPLETE DETERMINATION OF PUNISHMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANT BY APPLYING A DISCOUNT AT THE WRONG RATE – NO...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
15.law office
Base: 2013/6434
Decision: 2014/273
Date of Decision: 15.01.2014
A CASE ARISING FROM A WORK CONTRACT – IN WHICH THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY WAIVES THE CASE – IN WHICH THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY IS AUTHORIZED TO WAIVE THE CASE IN HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
2.law office
Base: 2003/11723
Decision: 2004/732
Date of Decision: 22.01.2004
REVOCATION OF INHERITANCE – IF THE RENUNCIATION AGREEMENT IS URGENT, IT WILL ALSO BE GRANTED TO THE FURU, UNLESS ITS CALIPHATE IS REQUIRED – THE TITLE OF HEIR - THE TRANSITION OF INHERITANCE...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
General Assembly of Law
Base: 1981/551
Decision: 1981/683
Date of Decision: 21.10.1981
DIVORCE CASE – WAIVER OF THE CASE - NO DECISION CORRECTION REVIEW CAN BE MADE ON THE CASE THAT HAS DISAPPEARED
SUMMARY: Since the plaintiff has waived his case, the case, which...
Exceptional cases of obtaining Turkish citizenship
ARTICLE 12 - (1) Foreigners mentioned below may obtain Turkish citizenship by the proposal of the Ministry, the decision of the Council of Ministers, provided that they are not in a position to pose an obstacle in terms of national...
Requirements for the application
ARTICLE 11 - (1) Foreigners who want to obtain Turkish citizenship;
a) To have the ability to be an adult and distinguish according to their national law and Turkish laws if they are stateless,
b) To reside in Turkey for five years without interruption...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
8.Criminal Department
Base: 2016/6624
Decision: 2016/8690
Date of Decision: 30.06.2016
THE CRIME OF PROVIDING BENEFITS BY USING A BANK OR CREDIT CARD WITHOUT PERMISSION – THE NEED TO MAKE A DISCOUNT ON THE DEFENDANT WHO MADE A PARTIAL PAYMENT DURING THE INVESTIGATION STAGE...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
7.Criminal Department
Base: 2014/30079
Decision: 2016/9027
Date of Decision: 30.06.2016
CRIME OF OPPOSITION TO LAW NO. 4733 – IT WAS DECIDED THAT THERE IS NO ROOM TO WITHDRAW THE DISCLOSURE OF THE PROVISION ON GROUNDS THAT DO NOT FALL WITHIN THE SCOPE OF...
