T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 11.law office Base: 2016/6246 Decision: 2016/6191 Date of Decision: 06.06.2016 RECEIVABLES CASE – THERE IS NO DULY FILED APPEAL REQUEST DURING THE NOTICE PERIOD – THERE IS NO LEGAL BENEFIT IN APPEALING THE PROVISION REJECTION OF THE APPEALS REQUESTS OF THE TSMF PROXIES...
Precautionary lien is a temporary legal protection that provides for the confiscation of the debtor's assets by a court decision to guarantee the outcome of the current follow-up of receivables. The creditor requests an injunction from the competent court on the basis of a suitable...
For the first time, you have to apply to the Population Directorates to get a passport, extend your existing passport, or perform other passport-related operations. Daiha was previously authorized by the General Directorates of Security in these transactions. Since April 2, 2018, the Population Directorates...
Upon the decision of the judge or in delay, the objectionable in cases where the Public prosecutor; If the Public Prosecutor cannot be reached, law enforcement officers can make a call by written order of the dec enforcement officer. However, in cases where the judge's decision...
The owner of the places to be searched or the name of the item is ready for the search can be found; if he is not found, his representative or one of the persons with the power to distinguish or a person or his neighbor who is...
Upon the decision of the judge or in delay, the objectionable in cases where the Public prosecutor; If the Public Prosecutor cannot be reached, law enforcement officers may carry out the confiscation process by written order of the law enforcement officer. (fig.) (2) The explicit identity of...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 7.Criminal Department Base: 2014/29494 Decision: 2016/9095 Date of Decision: 30.06.2016 OPPOSITION CRIME NO. 4733 – SINCE IT IS CONSIDERED SUFFICIENT THAT THE ACT WAS COMMITTED BY TWO PEOPLE IN TERMS OF THE OCCURRENCE OF A MASS SMUGGLING CRIME, THE DEFENDANTS' SENTENCES SHOULD BE...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 3.Criminal Department Base: 2016/11885 Decision: 2016/15033 Date of Decision: 28.06.2016 INTENTIONAL INJURY CRIME – THE DEFENDANT WHO IS UNDERSTOOD NOT TO HAVE COMPLETED THE AGE OF FIFTEEN AT THE TIME OF THE CRIME - ALTHOUGH A DISCOUNT SHOULD BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 3.Criminal Department Base: 2015/34137 Decision: 2016/15145 Date of Decision: 28.06.2016 SIMPLE INJURY OFFENSE – THE NEED TO APPLY A MINIMUM REDUCTION IN THE DEFENDANT'S SENTENCE – INCOMPLETE DETERMINATION OF PUNISHMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANT BY APPLYING A DISCOUNT AT THE WRONG RATE – NO...
