INFORMATION Archives - Page 58 of 81 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
211
archive,paged,category,category-information,category-211,paged-58,category-paged-58,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.4.7,vc_responsive
 

INFORMATION

T.C. SUPREME COURT 5.Criminal Department Based on: 2015/11443 Decision: 2016/352 Date of Decision: 14.01.2016 CRIME OF ABUSE OF TRUST DUE TO SERVICE – FAILURE TO DELIVER THE MONEY COLLECTED OR DELIVERED BY LAWYERS TO THE CLIENT WHO OWNS THE BUSINESS AND TO ACQUIRE GOODS – INCOMPLETE EXAMINATION AND INSUFFICIENT GROUNDS...

T.C. SUPREME COURT 23.law office Main: 2014/8017 Decision: 2015/2377 Date of Decision: 09.04.2015 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DECISION TO CANCEL THE COMPLAINT CASE – A DECISION SHOULD BE MADE ACCORDING TO THE RESULT BY EVALUATING THE EXPERT REPORT RECEIVED BY THE COMPLAINANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ORDER – THE IMPOSSIBILITY...

T.C. SUPREME COURT 1.law office Main: 2014/200 Decision: 2014/12761 Date of Decision: 02.07.2014 TITLE CANCELLATION REGISTRATION AND COMPENSATION CASE – DUE TO THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SHOWN VALUE AND THE ACTUAL VALUE OF THE REAL ESTATE, THE PLAINTIFF IS WRONGFUL AND THE POWER OF ATTORNEY FEE WILL NOT REQUIRE JUDGMENT...

T.C. SUPREME COURT 1.law office Based on: 2013/18150 Decision: 2014/4386 Date of Decision: 26.02.2014 ACCORDING TO THE FACT THAT THE DEFENDANTS IN THE MERGED CASE ACCEPTED THE CASE AT THE FIRST HEARING WHERE THEY REPRESENTED THEMSELVES AS A PROXY, IN THE ORIGINAL AND MERGED CASE, THE POWER OF ATTORNEY FEE...

T.C. SUPREME COURT 20.law office Main: 2016/8402 Decision: 2016/7559 Date of Decision: 13.07.2016 COMPENSATION CASE – UPON EXPRESSING AN OPINION ON THE REJECTION OF THE REQUEST BY THE REJECTED JUDGE, IT WAS DECIDED TO REJECT THE REJECTION REQUEST BY THE AUTHORITY EXAMINING THE FILE AND PUNISH THE DEFENDANT WITH A...

T.C. SUPREME COURT 20.law office Main: 2016/8414 Decision: 2016/7571 Date of Decision: 13.07.2016 CASE OF COMPENSATION – REFUSAL OF WHICH THE JUDGE HAS REQUESTED – THE REASONS PUT FORWARD FOR THE JUDGE'S REFUSAL ARE THE REASON FOR THE APPEAL ON THE MERITS OF THE WORK - THE DECISION IS UPHELD SUMMARY:...

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran