INFORMATION Archives - Page 55 of 81 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
211
archive,paged,category,category-information,category-211,paged-55,category-paged-55,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.4.7,vc_responsive
 

INFORMATION

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 15.law office Base: 2016/577 Decision: 2016/3867 Date of Decision: 14.07.2016 THE CASE ARISING FROM THE WORK CONTRACT – AS A RESULT OF AN ACCOUNT ERROR, IT WAS DECIDED TO COLLECT THE FEE FROM THE DEFENDANT – THE REQUEST FOR CORRECTION OF THE DECISION IN THIS DIRECTION...

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 20.law office Base: 2016/3944 Decision: 2016/7541 Date of Decision: 28.06.2016 CASE OF OBJECTION TO CADASTRAL REGISTRATION – A REPORT SHOULD BE RECEIVED FROM THE AGRICULTURAL ENGINEER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PURPOSE OF THE LAW ON WHETHER THE REAL ESTATE IS IRRIGATED OR DRY AGRICULTURAL LAND, AND...

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 22.law office Base: 2015/6421 Decision: 2016/19279 Date of Decision: 27.06.2016 CASE OF EMPLOYEE RECEIVABLES - TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP AS A PENSIONER – WHETHER THE PRE–TRANSFER DEBTS OF THE PROVINCIAL SPECIAL ADMINISTRATION, WHICH HAS BEEN ABOLISHED AS A LEGAL ENTITY, HAVE BEEN TRANSFERRED TO ANY INSTITUTION...

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 3.law office Base: 2016/8767 Decision: 2016/10150 Date of Decision: 27.06.2016 TEMPORARY SUBSCRIPTION FACILITY CASE – DUE TO THE FACT THAT AN EXPERT REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED AND AN APPROPRIATE DECISION HAS BEEN MADE THROUGH EXPERT EXPERTS ON WHETHER THE FENNI REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET AND AN...

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 20.law office Base: 2015/7808 Decision: 2016/7383 Date of Decision: 22.06.2016 COMPENSATION CASE – CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION ARISING FROM THE KEEPING OF THE LAND REGISTRY – RE–INVESTIGATION AND EVALUATION OF WHETHER THE REAL ESTATE CAN BE CONSIDERED AS A LAND PLOT - DECISIVENESS OF THE PROVISION BASED...

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 20.law office Base: 2015/7834 Decision: 2016/7381 Date of Decision: 22.06.2016 COMPENSATION CASE – CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION ARISING FROM THE KEEPING OF THE LAND REGISTRY – RE–INVESTIGATION AND EVALUATION OF WHETHER THE REAL ESTATE CAN BE CONSIDERED AS A LAND PLOT - DECISIVENESS OF THE PROVISION BASED...

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 15.law office Base: 2016/3094 Decision: 2016/3597 Date of Decision: 21.06.2016 CASE OF CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL – WHERE BOTH PARTIES ARE MERCHANTS AND RELATED TO THE COMMERCIAL BUSINESS OF THE PARTIES – VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION ABSTRACT: In a concrete dispute, the plaintiff is the subcontractor and...

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 6.Criminal Department Base: 2015/4741 Decision: 2016/5636 Date of Decision: 30.06.2016 THE CRIME OF THREATENING WITH A WEAPON – BY THE DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, THE CLAUSE WRITTEN IN THE ARTICLE OF THE TCK IS CANCELED FOR THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT TO ELECT AND OTHER...

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 8.Criminal Department Base: 2016/6617 Decision: 2016/8693 Date of Decision: 30.06.2016 CRIME OF MISUSE OF BANK OR CREDIT CARDS – DETERMINATION AND APPRECIATION OF THE LEGAL SITUATION BY EVALUATING ALL THE EVIDENCE BY SHOWING THE CD IMAGES TO THE DEFENDANT AND ASKING IF THE PERSON IN THE...

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran