INFORMATION Archives - Page 43 of 83 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
211
archive,paged,category,category-information,category-211,paged-43,category-paged-43,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,no_animation_on_touch,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

INFORMATION

HOW TO CHOOSE A MEDIATOR? The parties agree to use the mediator at the official web address of our Department, which is www.adb.adalet.gov.tr they can select it from the list of current mediators located at the address. IS MEDIATION AN EXPENSIVE METHOD? Until the process is completed, the...

T.C. SUPREME COURT 15.law office Base: 2016/3455 Decision: 2016/3829 Date of Decision: 12.07.2016 CASE OF CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL – IF THE FEES AND EXPENSES ARE NOT COMPLETED WITHIN THE SPECIFIED TIME, IT WILL BE DECIDED THAT THE DECISION WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED APPEALED – DUE TO THE NEED TO...

T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 7.Criminal Department Base: 2014/29494 Decision: 2016/9095 Date of Decision: 30.06.2016 OPPOSITION CRIME NO. 4733 – SINCE IT IS CONSIDERED SUFFICIENT THAT THE ACT WAS COMMITTED BY TWO PEOPLE IN TERMS OF THE OCCURRENCE OF A MASS SMUGGLING CRIME, THE DEFENDANTS' SENTENCES SHOULD BE INCREASED – VIOLATION...

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 20.law office Base: 2016/635 Decision: 2016/7543 Date of Decision: 28.06.2016 REQUEST FOR CANCELLATION OF CADASTRAL DETERMINATIONS - IF THE CADASTRAL RECORD IS THE ORIGINAL DEFENDANT, THE CASE FILE SHOULD BE TAKEN BETWEEN THE FILES AND A DECISION SHOULD BE MADE ACCORDINGLY ABOUT THE...

T.C. SUPREME COURT 2.law office Base: 2016/6780 Decision: 2016/12633 Date of Decision: 28.06.2016 CLAIM FOR RECEIVING CONTRIBUTIONS – CLAIM FOR RECEIVING CONTRIBUTIONS ON REAL ESTATE ACQUIRED DURING THE PROPERTY SEPARATION REGIME – FAILURE TO DECIDE WHETHER TO PAY INTEREST ON THE TOTAL AMOUNT DECIDED EFFECTIVE FROM THE DATE OF THE...

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran