INFORMATION Archives - Page 27 of 82 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
211
archive,paged,category,category-information,category-211,paged-27,category-paged-27,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.4.7,vc_responsive
 

INFORMATION

T.C. COURT OF CASSATION 1. CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT Mainly No:2014/6118 Decision No:2015/3222 Decision Date: Communiqué No: 1 – 2013/332054 COURT : Adana 4. High Criminal Court DATE AND NO: 02/05/2013, 2012/239(E) and 2013/244(K) CRIME : Qualified manslaughter, aiding in this crime The collected evidence is examined at the place of the verdict, accused .....

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 17.law office Base: 2014/10275 Decision: 2014/9522 Date of Decision: 12.06.2014 COMPENSATION CASE – THE PARTIES TO THE ACCIDENT MUST DETERMINE THE DEFECT RATES AND THE LOSS OF VALUE CAUSED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S VEHICLE – THE NEED TO OBTAIN A REPORT CONDUCIVE TO A...

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 23.law office Base: 2014/539 Decision: 2014/4650 Date of Decision: 17.06.2014 CASE OF CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL – LEGAL RELATIONSHIP ARISING FROM A CONTRACT OR LAW STIPULATING JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY AND NO REASON – HOLDING THE NATURAL PERSON RESPONSIBLE DUE TO THE NEED...

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 17.law office Base: 2014/15380 Decision: 2014/13064 Date of Decision: 30.09.2014 COMPENSATION CASE – REFUSAL OF THE CLAIM FOR FINANCIAL COMPENSATION AGAINST THE DEFENDANT DUE TO THE ORDER OF THE WAIVER ABOUT THE INSURANCE COMPANY TO THE DEFENDANT AND THE NEED NOT TO JUDGE...

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 10.law office Base: 2014/741 Decision: 2014/26102 Date of Decision: 09.12.2014 COMPENSATION CASE – IT IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THAT THE INSTITUTION WILL RECEIVE A RECOURSE AS A RESULT OF COMPARING THE AMOUNT OF THE FIRST ADVANCE CAPITAL-VALUED INCOME BY CALCULATING THE AMOUNTS OF...

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran