INFORMATION Archives - Page 56 of 83 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
211
archive,paged,category,category-information,category-211,paged-56,category-paged-56,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
2.law office
Base: 2015/13927
Decision: 2016/5499
Date of Decision: 21.03.2016
DIVORCE CASE – WHETHER THE CASE CARRIES AN ELEMENT OF ALIENATION – THE NEED TO EXAMINE THE MERITS OF THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH TURKISH LAW – THE NEED TO OVERTURN THE PROVISION
ABSTRACT:...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
14.law office
Base: 2015/12867
Decision: 2016/2952
Date of Decision: 08.03.2016
CASE OF CANCELLATION OF THE CERTIFICATE OF INHERITANCE – IF THERE IS REAL ESTATE BELONGING TO THE DECEASED , THE TITLE REGISTER AND THE BASIS DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE BROUGHT AND IT SHOULD BE...
T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION
14.law office
Base: 2015/16277
Decision: 2016/2733
Date of Decision: 03.03.2016
REQUEST FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF INHERITANCE - THE NEED TO DETERMINE THE HEIRS AND SHARES OF THE HEIR - THE NEED TO VIOLATE THE PROVISION
SUMMARY: The case concerns the request to issue a...
T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION
14.law office
Base: 2015/12937
Decision: 2016/2555
Date of Decision: 01.03.2016
REQUEST TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF INHERITANCE - DECEASED'S POPULATION REGISTRATION INFORMATION AND ADDRESS HAVE NOT BEEN INVESTIGATED THESE ISSUES HAVE NOT BEEN ASKED BY THE LAND REGISTRY OFFICE - THE PROVISION HAS BEEN BROKEN
ABSTRACT: It...
T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION
21.Criminal Department
Base: 2015/5637
Decision: 2016/1463
Date of Decision: 18.02.2016
FORGERY OFFENCE – THE INADMISSIBILITY OF DECIDING ON THE CONVICTION OF THE ACCUSED WITHOUT REGARD TO THE FACT THAT HIS ACTION FALLS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF USELESS FORGERY AND DOES NOT OCCUR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE...
In general, the rules regarding the goods regime in our law;
the rights, obligations of each of them to the property belonging to him and his wife, from each other when the property regime ends (death
what are the rights they can claim (from their heirs
it is...
In cases related to the liquidation of the goods regime, such as the contribution receivable case, the value increase share case, the residual value participation receivable case
first of all, it is necessary to determine the following issues: according to what rules of the goods regime...
In order for a lawsuit to be filed against the decimation of the goods regime, the existing goods regime between the parties must end. The termination of the property regime and the termination of the marriage union are not the same. Sometimes
the current property regime...
Cases related to the matrimonial property, which are currently being examined on appeal in the Supreme Court, heard in family courts; “case on transition to the extraordinary goods regime” (Turkish Civil Code art. 206 et seq.), “the case for the acquisition of a share of...
CASE OF CHANGING TO EXTRAORDINARY MATRIMONIAL PROPERTY
Spouses can be legally “together” at any time by the contract of the goods regime
the right to change the current regime of goods between them within dec limits
they are entitled. However, in some cases, it is possible to decipher...