INFORMATION Archives - Page 54 of 83 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE

Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.

alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz

211

archive,paged,category,category-information,category-211,paged-54,category-paged-54,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive

INFORMATION

27 Nov APPLICATION OF MULTIPLE RECEIPT OF LIEN DELIVERY FEE

Posted at 14:32h in INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

APPLICATION OF MULTIPLE RECEIPT OF LIEN DELIVERY FEE A fee is a money received by the State in exchange for a service performed. Judicial decisions and doctrine considering the evil eye, the fee is considered a kind of tax. The fact that fees can be charged for a...

26 Nov EXECUTION OF LIEN DECISIONS AND CHANGES IN HMK 6100

Posted at 19:53h in INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

1. According to the former HMUK, the creditor, who has a documented receivable in his hands, goes to court for precautionary foreclosure he would take the decision and just start enforcement proceedings. By foreclosing on the property before execution, the borrower he would confiscate their property; afterwards,...

26 Nov IT IS CLEAR FROM THE EXPERT REPORT THAT THE PLAINTIFF DID NOT PAY THE AGREED AMOUNT OF THE AMOUNT OF THE WORK THAT THE PLAINTIFF MUST PAY ON THE DELIVERY DATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT NO LATER THAN THE TIME AGREED IN THE CONTRACT

Posted at 19:36h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 15.Legal Department Base: 2019/ 2487 Decision: 2020 / 654 Decision Date: 19.02.2020 SUMMARY: According to the scope of the file ...

26 Nov THE CASE ARISING FROM THE WORK CONTRACT – THE NEED TO BE DECIDED ACCORDING TO THE RESULT BY OBTAINING AN ADDITION REPORT FROM EXPERTS ON THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION SITE GROWTH AND THE DISMISSAL OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY ON THE DURATION – THE VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION

Posted at 19:35h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 15.Law Department, Base: 2019 / 2119 Decision: 2020 / 662 Decision Date: 19.02.2020 ABSTRACT: Although the plaintiff-defendant of the merged file explained that the contractor was decommissioned from his/her proxy by the land owners during the continuation of the construction and therefore there...

26 Nov A CASE ARISING FROM A WORK CONTRACT – A DECISION THAT HE WILL RECEIVE A SMALLER AMOUNT OF MERIT BY DEDUCTING A CASH GUARANTEE, AS HE WILL RECEIVE AN UNPAID WORK FEE – A VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION

Posted at 19:33h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 15.Law Department Base: 2019/1938 Decision: 2020/675 Decision Date: 19.02.2020 ABSTRACT: While the court should have decided that the unpaid claim will be accepted partially over TL calculated by experts and without cash guarantee deduction, it was not correct to conclude that it will...

25 Nov REFUSAL OF THE PETITION FOR CORRECTION OF THE DECISION

Posted at 21:45h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 15.Legal Department Date of Issue: 2019/ 2160 Decision: 2020 / 679 Decision Date: 19.02.2020 ABSTRACT: As for the concrete case, as explained above, it was decided to reject the petition for correction of the decision of the plaintiff-merged file defendants, as it became...

25 Nov COMPENSATION CASE – THE AMOUNT REJECTED IN THE DECISION ON ITS COLLECTION IS OF A DEFINITE NATURE, SINCE IT FALLS UNDER THE LIMIT OF APPEAL IN TERMS OF THE AMOUNT – REFUSAL OF THE PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY’S APPEALS

Posted at 21:43h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 23.Legal Department Basis: 2016/ 9666 Decision: 2020 / 1094 Decision Date: 19.02.2020 ABSTRACT: The amount rejected by the plaintiff's lawyer in the decision made by the court on the partial acceptance of the case and the collection of the total x Turkish Lira...

25 Nov DECOMMISSIONING OF THE APPEAL – ACCORDING TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND THE ADDITION TYPE TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SPECIFICATION, THE ADMINISTRATION CAN CHECK WHETHER THE WORKERS’ LABOR RIGHTS AND RECEIVABLES HAVE BEEN PAID – APPROVAL OF THE PROVISION

Posted at 21:37h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 23.Legal Department Base: 2016/ 9622 Decision: 2020 / 1098 Decision Date: 19.02.2020 Summary: the court's claim, defense, expert reports, and all file scope, according to the defendant, the plaintiff terminated by service contracts accrued severance pay due to workers by the contractor upon...

25 Nov CASE OF RECEIVABLES – THE NEED TO DETERMINE THE START DATES OF INTEREST THAT WILL BE PROCESSED ON CLAIMS OTHER THAN SEVERANCE PAY, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE CLAIMS SUBJECT TO A DEFAULT WARNING AND A DEFAULT WARNING ACCORDINGLY – VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION

Posted at 21:34h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C COURT OF CASSATION 9.Legal Department Base: 2016/ 34036 Decision: 2020 / 2430 Decision Date: 18.02.2020 ABSTRACT: While the starting dates of the interest rates to be processed for claims other than severance pay should be determined accordingly by taking into account the plaintiff's default warning...

23 Nov REQUEST FOR SEARCH AND SEIZURE

Posted at 18:34h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

... TO THE JUDICATURE OF THE CRIMINAL COURT OF MAGISTRATES File No : .../... D. labor WHO MADE THE REQUEST : attorney : SUBJECT : This is a call and decommission prompt. INSTRUCTIONS : 1-) Suspects ... ... and ... ... about our client due to the fact that they reproduced...

INFORMATION

27 Nov APPLICATION OF MULTIPLE RECEIPT OF LIEN DELIVERY FEE

26 Nov EXECUTION OF LIEN DECISIONS AND CHANGES IN HMK 6100

26 Nov IT IS CLEAR FROM THE EXPERT REPORT THAT THE PLAINTIFF DID NOT PAY THE AGREED AMOUNT OF THE AMOUNT OF THE WORK THAT THE PLAINTIFF MUST PAY ON THE DELIVERY DATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT NO LATER THAN THE TIME AGREED IN THE CONTRACT

26 Nov THE CASE ARISING FROM THE WORK CONTRACT – THE NEED TO BE DECIDED ACCORDING TO THE RESULT BY OBTAINING AN ADDITION REPORT FROM EXPERTS ON THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION SITE GROWTH AND THE DISMISSAL OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY ON THE DURATION – THE VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION

26 Nov A CASE ARISING FROM A WORK CONTRACT – A DECISION THAT HE WILL RECEIVE A SMALLER AMOUNT OF MERIT BY DEDUCTING A CASH GUARANTEE, AS HE WILL RECEIVE AN UNPAID WORK FEE – A VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION

25 Nov REFUSAL OF THE PETITION FOR CORRECTION OF THE DECISION

25 Nov COMPENSATION CASE – THE AMOUNT REJECTED IN THE DECISION ON ITS COLLECTION IS OF A DEFINITE NATURE, SINCE IT FALLS UNDER THE LIMIT OF APPEAL IN TERMS OF THE AMOUNT – REFUSAL OF THE PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY’S APPEALS

25 Nov DECOMMISSIONING OF THE APPEAL – ACCORDING TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND THE ADDITION TYPE TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SPECIFICATION, THE ADMINISTRATION CAN CHECK WHETHER THE WORKERS’ LABOR RIGHTS AND RECEIVABLES HAVE BEEN PAID – APPROVAL OF THE PROVISION

25 Nov CASE OF RECEIVABLES – THE NEED TO DETERMINE THE START DATES OF INTEREST THAT WILL BE PROCESSED ON CLAIMS OTHER THAN SEVERANCE PAY, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE CLAIMS SUBJECT TO A DEFAULT WARNING AND A DEFAULT WARNING ACCORDINGLY – VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION

23 Nov REQUEST FOR SEARCH AND SEIZURE

Address

Phone

E-Mail