INFORMATION Archives - Page 29 of 83 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE

Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.

alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz

211

archive,paged,category,category-information,category-211,paged-29,category-paged-29,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive

INFORMATION

02 Mar A DECISION ON THE NEED TO DETERMINE THE DEFECT RATES OF THE PARTIES TO THE ACCIDENT AND THE LOSS OF VALUE CAUSED BY THE PLAINTIFF’S VEHICLE

Posted at 21:30h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 17.law office Base: 2014/10275 Decision: 2014/9522 Date of Decision: 12.06.2014 COMPENSATION CASE – THE PARTIES TO THE ACCIDENT MUST DETERMINE THE DEFECT RATES AND THE LOSS OF VALUE CAUSED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S VEHICLE – THE NEED TO OBTAIN A REPORT CONDUCIVE TO A...

02 Mar A LEGAL RELATIONSHIP ARISING FROM A CONTRACT OR LAW PROVIDING FOR JOINT AND FIDUCIARY LIABILITY AND A DECISION ON THE ABSENCE OF A REASON

Posted at 21:22h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 23.law office Base: 2014/539 Decision: 2014/4650 Date of Decision: 17.06.2014 CASE OF CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL – LEGAL RELATIONSHIP ARISING FROM A CONTRACT OR LAW STIPULATING JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY AND NO REASON – HOLDING THE NATURAL PERSON RESPONSIBLE DUE TO THE NEED...

02 Mar THE DECISION ON THE REFUSAL OF THE CLAIMANT FOR MATERIAL COMPENSATION DUE TO THE REFUSAL OF THE WAIVER OF THE WAIVER ABOUT THE INSURANCE COMPANY TO THE DEFENDANT AND THE NEED NOT TO JUDGE THE COSTS OF PROCEEDINGS AGAINST HIM AND THE POWER OF ATTORNEY DUE TO THE WAIVER.

Posted at 21:20h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 17.law office Base: 2014/15380 Decision: 2014/13064 Date of Decision: 30.09.2014 COMPENSATION CASE – REFUSAL OF THE CLAIM FOR FINANCIAL COMPENSATION AGAINST THE DEFENDANT DUE TO THE ORDER OF THE WAIVER ABOUT THE INSURANCE COMPANY TO THE DEFENDANT AND THE NEED NOT TO JUDGE...

02 Mar THE DECISION THAT THE INSTITUTION’S RECOURSE SHOULD BE DETERMINED AS A RESULT OF COMPARING THE AMOUNT OF THE FIRST ADVANCE CAPITAL-VALUED INCOME BY CALCULATING THE ACTUAL AMOUNTS OF LOSSES

Posted at 21:18h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 10.law office Base: 2014/741 Decision: 2014/26102 Date of Decision: 09.12.2014 COMPENSATION CASE – IT IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THAT THE INSTITUTION WILL RECEIVE A RECOURSE AS A RESULT OF COMPARING THE AMOUNT OF THE FIRST ADVANCE CAPITAL-VALUED INCOME BY CALCULATING THE AMOUNTS OF...

01 Mar A DECISION ON THE NEED TO RECOGNIZE THAT THE DEFENDANTS ARE STAKEHOLDERS WITH A ONE–THIRD STAKE IN THE REAL ESTATE SUBJECT TO LITIGATION – THE PLAINTIFF GIVES MONEY TO THE DEFENDANTS SEPARATELY FOR THEIR SHARES – THE DEFENDANTS CANNOT BE HELD JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY LIABLE FOR THE TOTAL AMOUNT GIVEN BY THE PLAINTIFF.

Posted at 21:55h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 3.law office Base: 2013/9856 Decision: 2013/12617 Date of Decision: 12.09.2013 CLAIM FOR RECEIVABLES – THE DEFENDANTS ARE STAKEHOLDERS WITH A ONE-THIRD STAKE IN THE REAL ESTATE SUBJECT TO THE LAWSUIT – THE PLAINTIFF GIVES MONEY TO THE DEFENDANTS SEPARATELY FOR THEIR SHARES -...

01 Mar WHAT IS THE ELIMINATION OF WILLPOWER IMPAIRMENT?

Posted at 21:53h in INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

If, as a result of error or deception, or as a result of intimidation, the contracting party does not notify that it is not bound by the contract within ONE YEAR from the moment it learns of the error or deception, or the effect of...

01 Mar WHAT ARE THE DEADLINES FOR REQUESTING A REFERRAL?

Posted at 21:52h in INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

The request for recourse expires with the expiration of TWO YEARS starting from the date when the full compensation is paid and the responsible person is found out together, and in any case TEN YEARS starting from the date when the full compensation is paid....

01 Mar MATURITY IN TIMES

Posted at 21:51h in INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

If a debt or any obligation that falls to one of the parties must be fulfilled after a certain period of time, starting with the establishment of the contract, the time for its performance is determined in the following form: 1. The period designated as...

01 Mar WHAT IS THE PLEDGE RIGHT? HOW TO SET UP A PLEDGE ?

Posted at 21:49h in INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

A pledge right is a right that authorizes the creditor to receive the receivable from the amount obtained by converting a movable or other right into money if the creditor who owns the right cannot receive the receivable. The owner has allocated the savings authority...

26 Feb SALE AND PROCEDURE OF REAL ESTATE IN ENFORCEMENT LAW

Posted at 15:24h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

CASHING IN (SALE) The third stage of enforcement proceedings is the cashing of the confiscated goods. Movable and immovable properties foreclosed by the enforcement directorate are sold at the request of the creditor for foreclosure and converted into money. As a rule, the right to request a...