INFORMATION Archives - Page 35 of 83 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
211
archive,paged,category,category-information,category-211,paged-35,category-paged-35,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
If there is more than one foreclosure on the same property, there is a participation in the foreclosure. A subsidiary that is subject to foreclosure (Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law No. 2004 m. 100 ) as it may be, it is also possible to participate in...
T.C THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
4.law office
Base: 2016/ 13193
Decision: 2019/39
Date of Decision: 14.01.2019
...
T.C THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
14.Criminal Department
Base: 2015/ 6298
Decision: 2018 / 7135
Date of Decision: 03.12.2018
The provisions issued by the court of first instance were appealed and the file was examined and considered as necessary:
In the examination of the provision established on the defendant for...
T.C THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
6.Criminal Department
Base: 2018/ 3052
Decision: 2018 / 7548
Date of Decision: 04.12.2018
Case: Kayseri 1. On 26.02.2018 day, 2017/825 Basis and 2018/102 Decision of the Heavy Criminal Court and against the conviction for looting, the defendant ...
WHAT IS THE CRIME OF FORCING?
The crime of forcing is embodied in the fact that a person is forced to commit a certain behavior using physical force. Although the crime of forcing is regulated as one of the “Crimes Against Decency” in Article 108 of...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
2. law office
E. 2014/16139
K. 2015/498
T. 15.1.2015
• SUBMISSION OF EVIDENCE FROM THE PARTIES CANNOT BE EXPECTED WITHOUT A PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION HEARING (IF THE COURT GIVES THE PARTIES THE OPPORTUNITY TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE AND SHOWS THAT THEIR WITNESSES SHOULD BE HEARD...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
19. law office
E. 2015/16385
K. 2016/287
T. 19.1.2016
• NOTIFICATION IF IT IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE ADDRESS OF THE ADDRESSEE (Notification of Arbitrariness is Possible to the Person to Be Notified, If One of the Neighbors Is Notified, the Manager or...
T.C THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF LAW
E. 2017/2-1287
K. 2019/90
T. 7.2.2019
* DIVORCE REQUEST BASED ON THE REASON FOR THE SHAKING OF THE MARRIAGE UNION ( The Lawyer has No Written Confirmation of the Notification of the Reasoned Decision to the Trainee Lawyer, and...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
12. law office
Base. 2016/2889
Decision. 2016/5851
T. 1.3.2016
• REQUEST CANCELLATION OF THE FOLLOW-UP
(It is Not Possible to Follow–Up by Sending an Executive Order by Cashing the Mortgage to the Owner of the Mortgage, Complaining That There is No Notification of a...
ENFORCEMENT OF MORTGAGES
A mortgage is a type of real estate pledge determined to guarantee a current or future receivable that is certain or likely to be born in the future.
Principal Mortgage; For receivables whose amount is specified at the time of the establishment of the...