General Archives - Page 30 of 163 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
1
archive,paged,category,category-genel,category-1,paged-30,category-paged-30,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

General

05 Nov

Posted at 23:13h in General, INFORMATION by
0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME COURT 20.law office Main: 2016/8402 Decision: 2016/7559 Date of Decision: 13.07.2016 COMPENSATION CASE – UPON EXPRESSING AN OPINION ON THE REJECTION OF THE REQUEST BY THE REJECTED JUDGE, IT WAS DECIDED TO REJECT THE REJECTION REQUEST BY THE AUTHORITY EXAMINING THE FILE AND PUNISH THE DEFENDANT WITH A...

05 Nov

Posted at 23:11h in General, INFORMATION by
0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME COURT 20.law office Main: 2016/8414 Decision: 2016/7571 Date of Decision: 13.07.2016 CASE OF COMPENSATION – REFUSAL OF WHICH THE JUDGE HAS REQUESTED – THE REASONS PUT FORWARD FOR THE JUDGE'S REFUSAL ARE THE REASON FOR THE APPEAL ON THE MERITS OF THE WORK - THE DECISION IS UPHELD SUMMARY:...

29 Oct

Posted at 14:37h in General, INFORMATION by
0 Likes

11.law office Base: 2016/4219 Decision: 2016/6890 Date of Decision: 22.06.2016 A REQUEST TO COLLECT CORPORATE DAMAGES – IN THE FORM OF A REQUEST TO BE RECEIVED JOINTLY FROM THE DEFENDANTS BASED ON THE AMOUNTS SPECIFIED IN EACH DEFENDANT AND GIVEN TO THE PLAINTIFF IN A CLEAR AND INCOMPREHENSIBLE WAY,...

29 Oct

Posted at 14:35h in General, INFORMATION by
0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME COURT 8.law office Base: 2016/10162 Decision: 2016/10473 Date of Decision: 14.06.2016 THE CASE ARISING FROM FORECLOSURE – THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OR RIGHT THAT THE DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COURT JUL WILL NOT EXCEED THE SPECIFIED AMOUNT IN ORDER TO CONDUCT AN APPEAL REVIEW – THE VALUE...

29 Oct

Posted at 14:29h in General, INFORMATION by
0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME COURT 8.law office Base: 2016/9690 Decision: 2016/10437 Date of Decision: 14.06.2016 FORTIFICATION CASE – THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OR RIGHT HELD BY THE DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COURT EXCEEDS THE ESTABLISHED AMOUNT IN ORDER FOR THE FOLLOW–UP OF FORTIFICATION CASES TO BE REVIEWED ON...

29 Oct

Posted at 14:26h in General, INFORMATION by
0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME COURT 4.law office Base: 2016/3774 Decision: 2016/7793 Date of Decision: 13.06.2016 COMPENSATION CASE – IT IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THE START DATE OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS AS OF THE DATE OF THE PLAINTIFF'S LOSS – THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS HAS EXPIRED – IT IS NECESSARY TO DECIDE...

29 Oct

Posted at 14:23h in General, INFORMATION by
0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME COURT 8.law office Base : 2014/21867 Decision: 2016/10043 Date of Decision: 08.06.2016 FORTIFICATION CASE – WHERE THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OR RIGHT CARRIED OUT BY THE DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COURT IS REQUIRED TO EXCEED THE SPECIFIED AMOUNT – APPROVAL OF THE PROVISION ABSTRACT: In order to conduct...

27 Oct

Posted at 20:30h in General, INFORMATION by
0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME COURT 1.law office Base: 2014/16696 Decision: 2016/5804 Date of Decision: 10.09.2016 CASE OF CANCELLATION AND REGISTRATION OF TITLE DEEDS – THERE IS NO INACCURACY IN THE DISCRETION OF THE EVIDENCE ON THE LEGAL AND JURIDICAL GROUNDS ON WHICH THE PROVISION IS BASED – APPROVAL OF THE PROVISION ABSTRACT: In...

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran