29 Nov CANCELLATION OF TITLE DEEDS DUE TO SIMULATION
T.C SUPREME COURT 1.Department of Law, Base: 2019/3518 Decision: 2020/762 Decision Date: 10.02.2020 THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT COURT : ...
General
29 Nov THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STOREY OWNERS BOARD ON OPENING A WORKPLACE
T.C SUPREME COURT 20.Legal Department, Base : 2019/ 4647 Decision: 2020 / 225 Decision Date: 20.01.2020 THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT COURT : Magistrate's Court At the end of the hearing of the case between the parties, the Supreme Court's examination of the established provision was requested...
29 Nov ALTHOUGH THE PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE CASE WAS DECIDED IN THE PARAGRAPH OF THE JUDGMENT, THE ATTORNEY FEE WAS NOT ASSESSED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT
T.C SUPREME COURT 20.Legal Department Base: 2019/ 3523 Decision: 2019 / 6673 Decision Date: 18.11.2019 ABSTRACT: The case is one of the exceptions to the prohibition against violation of the charter and must be observed by the court personally at all stages of the trial. It...
26 Nov IT IS CLEAR FROM THE EXPERT REPORT THAT THE PLAINTIFF DID NOT PAY THE AGREED AMOUNT OF THE AMOUNT OF THE WORK THAT THE PLAINTIFF MUST PAY ON THE DELIVERY DATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT NO LATER THAN THE TIME AGREED IN THE CONTRACT
T.C SUPREME COURT 15.Legal Department Base: 2019/ 2487 Decision: 2020 / 654 Decision Date: 19.02.2020 SUMMARY: According to the scope of the file ...
26 Nov THE CASE ARISING FROM THE WORK CONTRACT – THE NEED TO BE DECIDED ACCORDING TO THE RESULT BY OBTAINING AN ADDITION REPORT FROM EXPERTS ON THE IMPACT OF CONSTRUCTION SITE GROWTH AND THE DISMISSAL OF THE POWER OF ATTORNEY ON THE DURATION – THE VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION
T.C SUPREME COURT 15.Law Department, Base: 2019 / 2119 Decision: 2020 / 662 Decision Date: 19.02.2020 ABSTRACT: Although the plaintiff-defendant of the merged file explained that the contractor was decommissioned from his/her proxy by the land owners during the continuation of the construction and therefore there...
26 Nov A CASE ARISING FROM A WORK CONTRACT – A DECISION THAT HE WILL RECEIVE A SMALLER AMOUNT OF MERIT BY DEDUCTING A CASH GUARANTEE, AS HE WILL RECEIVE AN UNPAID WORK FEE – A VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION
T.C SUPREME COURT 15.Law Department Base: 2019/1938 Decision: 2020/675 Decision Date: 19.02.2020 ABSTRACT: While the court should have decided that the unpaid claim will be accepted partially over TL calculated by experts and without cash guarantee deduction, it was not correct to conclude that it will...
25 Nov REFUSAL OF THE PETITION FOR CORRECTION OF THE DECISION
T.C SUPREME COURT 15.Legal Department Date of Issue: 2019/ 2160 Decision: 2020 / 679 Decision Date: 19.02.2020 ABSTRACT: As for the concrete case, as explained above, it was decided to reject the petition for correction of the decision of the plaintiff-merged file defendants, as it became...
25 Nov COMPENSATION CASE – THE AMOUNT REJECTED IN THE DECISION ON ITS COLLECTION IS OF A DEFINITE NATURE, SINCE IT FALLS UNDER THE LIMIT OF APPEAL IN TERMS OF THE AMOUNT – REFUSAL OF THE PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY’S APPEALS
T.C SUPREME COURT 23.Legal Department Basis: 2016/ 9666 Decision: 2020 / 1094 Decision Date: 19.02.2020 ABSTRACT: The amount rejected by the plaintiff's lawyer in the decision made by the court on the partial acceptance of the case and the collection of the total x Turkish Lira...
25 Nov DECOMMISSIONING OF THE APPEAL – ACCORDING TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND THE ADDITION TYPE TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SPECIFICATION, THE ADMINISTRATION CAN CHECK WHETHER THE WORKERS’ LABOR RIGHTS AND RECEIVABLES HAVE BEEN PAID – APPROVAL OF THE PROVISION
T.C SUPREME COURT 23.Legal Department Base: 2016/ 9622 Decision: 2020 / 1098 Decision Date: 19.02.2020 Summary: the court's claim, defense, expert reports, and all file scope, according to the defendant, the plaintiff terminated by service contracts accrued severance pay due to workers by the contractor upon...
25 Nov CASE OF RECEIVABLES – THE NEED TO DETERMINE THE START DATES OF INTEREST THAT WILL BE PROCESSED ON CLAIMS OTHER THAN SEVERANCE PAY, TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE CLAIMS SUBJECT TO A DEFAULT WARNING AND A DEFAULT WARNING ACCORDINGLY – VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION
T.C COURT OF CASSATION 9.Legal Department Base: 2016/ 34036 Decision: 2020 / 2430 Decision Date: 18.02.2020 ABSTRACT: While the starting dates of the interest rates to be processed for claims other than severance pay should be determined accordingly by taking into account the plaintiff's default warning...
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- 122
- 123
- 124
- 125
- 126
- 127
- 128
- 129
- 130
- 131
- 132
- 133
- 134
- 135
- 136
- 137
- 138
- 139
- 140
- 141
- 142
- 143
- 144
- 145
- 146
- 147
- 148
- 149
- 150
- 151
- 152
- 153
- 154
- 155
- 156
- 157
- 158
- 159
- 160
- 161
- 162
- 163
