AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE | General
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
1
archive,paged,category,category-genel,category-1,paged-5,category-paged-5,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,no_animation_on_touch,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.4.7,vc_responsive
 

General

... TO THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT PLAINTIFF : TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : ADDRESS : Deputy : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) ADDRESS : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) Defendants: 1- 2- Address : Subject : from the request for elimination of stakeholders in real estate references INSTRUCTIONS : 1-Our client has built a two-storey summer house...

... TO THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT PLAINTIFF : TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : ADDRESS : Deputy : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) ADDRESS : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) Defendants: 1- 2- Address : Subject: it consists of the desire to eliminate the partnership by establishing condominium. Our explanations : 1 -) Our Client, together with...

... MAGISTRATE'S COURT JUDGE PLAINTIFF : TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : ADDRESS : Deputy : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) ADDRESS : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) DEFENDANT : Address : Subject: Heritage consists of our desire to eliminate the partnership. INSTRUCTIONS : 1 -) Muris ... ... died on the date ... ......

T.C. SUPREME 1.Legal Department Mainly: 2015/3581 Decision: 2016/7039 Decision Date: 09.06.2016 ECRIMISIL CASE – THE REALIZATION OF THE USUFRUCT BAN CONDITION IN TERMS OF REAL ESTATE WILL BE SOUGHT – WHETHER THE ACTUAL USE THAT BINDS ALL STAKEHOLDERS IN THE CONTENTIOUS REAL ESTATE WHERE THE 3-STOREY BUILDING IS LOCATED IS...

T.C. SUPREME 3.Legal Department Mainly: 2016/8735 Verdict: 2016/10148 Decision Date: 27.06.2016 CREDIT CASE – FAILURE TO DISCUSS WHETHER THE PLAINTIFF, WHO DOES NOT OBJECT TO THE VALUATION REPORT, CAN CLAIM THIS PRICE IN THIS CASE – THE PROVISION IS BROKEN Abstract: whether the irrigation well costs that were not taken into...

T.C. SUPREME 20.Legal Department Basis: 2016/4846 Decision: 2016/6835 Decision Date: 13.06.2016 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES – THE NEED FOR THE CASES TO BE HEARD TOGETHER AND FOR THE DISPUTE TO BE RESOLVED BY THE COMMERCIAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE, WHICH IS A SPECIAL COURT IN TERMS OF ALL CLAIMS – DETERMINATION...

T.C. SUPREME 17.Legal Department Basis: 2016/5641 Decision: 2016/7179 Decision Date: 13.06.2016 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES - THE COURT MUST RULE ON INTEREST ONLY FOR THE PART OF THE PRICE INCREASED FROM THE DATE OF THE CASE – CORRECTION AND APPROVAL OF THE PROVISION Abstract: in a concrete case, interest was not requested...

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran