AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE | General
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
1
archive,paged,category,category-genel,category-1,paged-22,category-paged-22,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,no_animation_on_touch,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.4.7,vc_responsive
 

General

T.C. SUPREME 16.Legal Department Basis: 2015/5675 Verdict: 2015/13516 Decision Date: 17.11.2015 CASE FOR CANCELLATION AND REGISTRATION OF THE TITLE – THE EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE DECISION IS BASED AND THE EVIDENCE DOES NOT HAVE A HIT IN THE DISCRETION – THE APPEALS ARE NOT IN PLACE – THE PROVISION IS...

T.C. SUPREME 13.Legal Department Basis: 2015/37944 Decision: 2015/34696 Decision Date: 30.11.2015 A CASE FOR THE CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL – THE NEED TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE PARTIES ARE CREDITORS OF EACH OTHER BETWEEN THE PREVIOUS PERIOD AND THE CONTRACT PERIOD – A DETAILED EXPERT REPORT WILL BE OBTAINED, WHICH WILL...

T.C. SUPREME 13.Legal Department Principal: 2015/2853 Decision: 2016/7239 Decision Date: 08.03.2016 CLAIM OF RECEIVABLES-THE COURT MUST OBTAIN A REPORT FROM AN EXPERT, CONSIDERING THAT THE PLAINTIFF HAS BEEN UNFAIRLY DISMISSED – THE REFUSAL OF THE CASE IN TERMS OF THE ATTORNEY'S FEE RELATED TO THE FILE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORATE...

T.C. SUPREME 13.Legal Department Basis: 2015/7350 Decision: 2015/31650 Decision Date: 03.11.2015 CREDIT CASE – THE COURT MUST FIRST EXAMINE AND EVALUATE ALL THE REASONS FOR DISMISSAL REPORTED BY THE DEFENDANTS, INCLUDING THE STAGE OF THE HEARING, AND MAKE A DECISION BASED ON THE RESULT-INCOMPLETE AND INCORRECT ASSESSMENT Abstract: the court should...

... TO THE PROSECUTOR OF THE REPUBLIC COMPLAINING : TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : ADDRESS : Deputy : ADDRESS : THE SUSPECT/S : DEPUTY : Crime: hijacking of goods used in the right to prison in the rental CRIMINAL HISTORY : INSTRUCTIONS 1 -) suspect....... , owned by our client and ... …./…. in the apartment located...

…. THE COURT PLAINTIFF : TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : ADDRESS : Deputy : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) ADDRESS : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) DEFENDANT : Address : LITIGATION VALUE : (In cases related to his assets) Subject: it consists of asking for payment of Attorney's fees. INSTRUCTIONS : 1 -) The defendant, ...

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran