General Archives - Page 25 of 163 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE

Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.

alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz

archive,paged,category,category-genel,category-1,paged-25,category-paged-25,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive

General

07 Dec SUPREME COURT DECISION ON NON-RECTIFICATION OF LABOR RECEIVABLES

Posted at 17:52h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 9.Legal Department, Base: 2015/ 36236 Decision: 2019 / 19791 Decision Date: 13.11.2019 THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT TRIBUNAL :EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL It became clear that the decision made as a result of the lawsuit between the parties was requested by the defendant's deputy to examine...

07 Dec THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION ON WHO OWNS THE BURDEN OF PROOF

Posted at 17:50h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 9.Legal Department, Base: 2015/34918 Decision: 2019/19490 Decision Date: 11.11.2019 THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT TRIBUNAL :EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL As a result of the case between the parties, it became clear that the decisionthe review of the appeal was requested by the parties' deputies and was...

04 Dec WHEN THE PLAINTIFF DOES NOT HAVE A REQUEST IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RELEVANT ARTICLES OF THE TBK, A DECISION SHOULD BE MADE TO DISMISS THE CASE, WHILE PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE AS A RESULT OF AN INCORRECT ASSESSMENT IS NOT CORRECT

Posted at 12:18h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 15.Legal Department, Base: 2017/ 4843 Decision: 2019 / 2993 Decision Date: 26.06.2019 ABSTRACT: The court cannot prove the claim that the plaintiff's performance has become impossible without the fault of the contract itself, the defendant decommissioned the power of attorney so that the...

04 Dec PLAINTIFF COULD NOT PROVE WITH CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE HE HAD PAID THE AMOUNT DUE UNDER THE CONTRACT

Posted at 12:16h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 13.Legal Department, Base: 2016/ 12625 Decision: 2019 / 6317 Decision Date: 20.05.2019 SUMMARY: By the court, the claimant must be paid in accordance with the contract ...

04 Dec THE DEFENDANT DOESN’T REQUEST FOR APPEAL

Posted at 12:12h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 19.Legal Department Base: 2018/ 1341 Decision: 2019 / 876 Decision Date: 14.02.2019 SUMMARY: at the point of a forfeit the defendant is justified in the price of pay is collected and determined that it is incorrect, at the request of the plaintiff and...

04 Dec SINCE THE PLAINTIFF DOES NOT HAVE AN ACTIVE HOSTILITY LICENSE, IT IS NECESSARY TO DECIDE ON THE REJECTION OF THE CLAIM

Posted at 12:07h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 8.Legal Department Base: 2018/ 14999 Decision: 2018 / 18937 Decision Date: 20.11.2018 ABSTRACT: The case is related to the request to remove the objection to the follow-up initiated for the collection of the lease receivable. There is no dispute between the parties regarding...

02 Dec THE ISSUE OF WHETHER THE PERFORMANCE HAS BECOME IMPOSSIBLE HAS BEEN INVESTIGATED AND A PROVISION HAS TO BE ESTABLISHED ACCORDING TO THE RESULT

Posted at 17:52h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 13.Legal Department, Base: 2017/ 3657 Decision: 2018 / 10801 Decision Date: 19.11.2018 SUMMARY: The documents in the court's file, the situation where the zoning plan of the place where the transformer is being moved has been canceled, and the provisions of the contract...

02 Dec SINCE THE COST OF PRODUCTION IS DESIRABLE AND THE AMOUNT IS DETERMINED BY THE TRIAL CONDUCTED AND THE EXPERT REPORT RECEIVED, EXECUTIVE DENIAL COMPENSATION CANNOT ALSO BE RULED ON

Posted at 17:51h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 15.Department of Law, Base: 2018/ 2380 Decision: 2018 / 1912 Decision Date: 14.05.2018 SUMMARY: a subcontracting agreement between the parties dated 13.03.2012 arranged in accordance with the cost of the plaintiff in the construction of the work; according to the expert report received...

02 Dec IF THE REQUESTED CRIMINAL REQUIREMENT IS OF A NATURE THAT WILL CAUSE THE DEFENDANT’S ECONOMIC RUIN, IT CONSISTS IN MAKING A DECISION ON THE APPROPRIATE CONCLUSION TO BE REACHED BY MAKING AN APPROPRIATE DISCOUNT

Posted at 17:49h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 19.Legal Department, Base: 2016/ 9422 Decision: 2018 / 1089 Decision Date: 01.03.2018 ABSTRACT: It is not correct to base the legal interpretations in expert reports issued by the court in violation of the provisions of the contract and the law on the judgment....

29 Nov SUPREME COURT DECISION ON CANCELLATION OF LAND REGISTRY

Posted at 15:16h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 1.Legal Department, Base: 2016/ 15630 Decision: 2020 / 798 Decision Date: 12.02.2020 THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE: COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE TYPE OF CASE : LAND> CANCELLATION AND REGISTRATION In the case dec between the parties; The plaintiff stated that the co-heirs registered their...

General

07 Dec SUPREME COURT DECISION ON NON-RECTIFICATION OF LABOR RECEIVABLES

07 Dec THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION ON WHO OWNS THE BURDEN OF PROOF

04 Dec WHEN THE PLAINTIFF DOES NOT HAVE A REQUEST IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RELEVANT ARTICLES OF THE TBK, A DECISION SHOULD BE MADE TO DISMISS THE CASE, WHILE PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE AS A RESULT OF AN INCORRECT ASSESSMENT IS NOT CORRECT

04 Dec PLAINTIFF COULD NOT PROVE WITH CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE THAT THE HE HAD PAID THE AMOUNT DUE UNDER THE CONTRACT

04 Dec THE DEFENDANT DOESN’T REQUEST FOR APPEAL

04 Dec SINCE THE PLAINTIFF DOES NOT HAVE AN ACTIVE HOSTILITY LICENSE, IT IS NECESSARY TO DECIDE ON THE REJECTION OF THE CLAIM

02 Dec THE ISSUE OF WHETHER THE PERFORMANCE HAS BECOME IMPOSSIBLE HAS BEEN INVESTIGATED AND A PROVISION HAS TO BE ESTABLISHED ACCORDING TO THE RESULT

02 Dec SINCE THE COST OF PRODUCTION IS DESIRABLE AND THE AMOUNT IS DETERMINED BY THE TRIAL CONDUCTED AND THE EXPERT REPORT RECEIVED, EXECUTIVE DENIAL COMPENSATION CANNOT ALSO BE RULED ON

02 Dec IF THE REQUESTED CRIMINAL REQUIREMENT IS OF A NATURE THAT WILL CAUSE THE DEFENDANT’S ECONOMIC RUIN, IT CONSISTS IN MAKING A DECISION ON THE APPROPRIATE CONCLUSION TO BE REACHED BY MAKING AN APPROPRIATE DISCOUNT

29 Nov SUPREME COURT DECISION ON CANCELLATION OF LAND REGISTRY

Address

Phone

E-Mail