T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 7.Criminal Department Base: 2014/30174 Decision: 2016/9031 Date of Decision: 30.06.2016 CRIME OF OPPOSITION TO LAW NO. 4733 – THE OWNER OF THE REGISTRATION OF THE VEHICLE USED IN THE CRIME WAS INFORMED OF THE CASE AND A VERDICT WAS ESTABLISHED BY INCOMPLETE EXAMINATION WITHOUT RECEIVING A...
T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 8.Criminal Department Base: 2016/6199 Decision: 2016/8684 Date of Decision: 30.06.2016 CRIME OF MISUSE OF CREDIT CARDS – A STATEMENT OF THE CREDIT CARD'S ACCOUNT MUST BE BROUGHT AND DETERMINED WHETHER IT WAS USED ON THE DATE OF THE INCIDENT AND A PROVISION MUST BE MADE ACCORDING...
T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 3.Criminal Department Base: 2016/238 Decision: 2016/15323 Date of Decision: 30.06.2016 OFFENSE OF WOUNDING – THE PROVISION ESTABLISHED ABOUT THE ACCUSED IS INCREASED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ARTICLE OF THE TCKNIN, WHILE THE RESULT IS THAT AN EXCESSIVE PENALTY IS ASSIGNED BY INCORRECTLY CALCULATING THE PENALTY –...
T.C. SUPREME COURT DECISION 7.Criminal Department Based on: 2016/10029 Decision: 2016/8897 Date of Decision: 23.06.2016 A CRIME OF SMUGGLING – A VEHICLE STOPPED AT ROAD CONTROL WAS SEIZED WITHOUT A BANDOL AND SMUGGLED CIGARETTES DURING A SEARCH – A VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION FACILITY WITH INCOMPLETE INSPECTION - A VIOLATION...
T.C. SUPREME COURT 7.Criminal Department Based on: 2014/28897 Decision: 2016/8781 Date of Decision: 23.06.2016 CRIME OF OPPOSITION TO LAW NO. 4733 – THE CONFISCATION OF ILLEGAL GOODS SUBJECT TO CRIME MUST BE SETTLED BY A DECISION, WHILE ITS DESTRUCTION BY DESTRUCTION IS ALSO RULED - CORRECTION AND APPROVAL OF THE...
T.C. SUPREME COURT 7.Criminal Department Based on: 2014/24599 Decision: 2016/8643 Date of Decision: 22.06.2016 VIOLATION OF LAW NO. 4733 - THE SUBJECT OF THE APPEAL REVIEW SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED WHETHER THERE IS A CONNECTION BETWEEN THIS FILE AND ANOTHER FILE IN TERMS OF THE APPLICATION OF A CHAIN CRIME –...
T.C. SUPREME COURT 5.Criminal Department Based on: 2015/11443 Decision: 2016/352 Date of Decision: 14.01.2016 CRIME OF ABUSE OF TRUST DUE TO SERVICE – FAILURE TO DELIVER THE MONEY COLLECTED OR DELIVERED BY LAWYERS TO THE CLIENT WHO OWNS THE BUSINESS AND TO ACQUIRE GOODS – INCOMPLETE EXAMINATION AND INSUFFICIENT GROUNDS...
T.C. SUPREME COURT 23.law office Main: 2014/8017 Decision: 2015/2377 Date of Decision: 09.04.2015 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DECISION TO CANCEL THE COMPLAINT CASE – A DECISION SHOULD BE MADE ACCORDING TO THE RESULT BY EVALUATING THE EXPERT REPORT RECEIVED BY THE COMPLAINANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ORDER – THE IMPOSSIBILITY...
T.C. SUPREME COURT 1.law office Main: 2014/200 Decision: 2014/12761 Date of Decision: 02.07.2014 TITLE CANCELLATION REGISTRATION AND COMPENSATION CASE – DUE TO THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SHOWN VALUE AND THE ACTUAL VALUE OF THE REAL ESTATE, THE PLAINTIFF IS WRONGFUL AND THE POWER OF ATTORNEY FEE WILL NOT REQUIRE JUDGMENT...
T.C. SUPREME COURT 1.law office Based on: 2013/18150 Decision: 2014/4386 Date of Decision: 26.02.2014 ACCORDING TO THE FACT THAT THE DEFENDANTS IN THE MERGED CASE ACCEPTED THE CASE AT THE FIRST HEARING WHERE THEY REPRESENTED THEMSELVES AS A PROXY, IN THE ORIGINAL AND MERGED CASE, THE POWER OF ATTORNEY FEE...
