General Archives - Page 18 of 163 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
1
archive,paged,category,category-genel,category-1,paged-18,category-paged-18,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
ENFORCEMENT OF MORTGAGES
A mortgage is a type of real estate pledge determined to guarantee a current or future receivable that is certain or likely to be born in the future.
Principal Mortgage; For receivables whose amount is specified at the time of the establishment of the...
When the pledged creditor is authorized to request the sale to him, he may request the sale of the immovable pledge within two years from the date of notification of the payment order to him. To convert the pledged property into money, the debtor or...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
20.law office
Base: 2016/747
Decision: 2016/2361
Date of Decision: 29.02.2016
THE COMPENSATION CASE – THE WORK SUBJECT TO CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS IN EXCHANGE FOR A SHARE OF THE LAND REQUIRES HIGH-LEVEL TECHNOLOGY – REFERS TO NARROW-DEC WORK CONTRACTS SUCH AS MAKING CABINETS AND REPAIRING...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
20.law office
Base: 2016/2982
Decision: 2016/5377
Date of Decision: 11.05.2016
THE CASE OF CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL – THAT THE DISPUTE AROSE FROM THE BANK CREDIT CARD AGREEMENT – THAT THE DISPUTE SHOULD BE SETTLED BY THE CONSUMER COURT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
11.law office
Base: 2016/6246
Decision: 2016/6191
Date of Decision: 06.06.2016
RECEIVABLES CASE – THERE IS NO DULY FILED APPEAL REQUEST DURING THE NOTICE PERIOD – THERE IS NO LEGAL BENEFIT IN APPEALING THE PROVISION REJECTION OF THE APPEALS REQUESTS OF THE TSMF PROXIES...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
7.Criminal Department
Base: 2014/29494
Decision: 2016/9095
Date of Decision: 30.06.2016
OPPOSITION CRIME NO. 4733 – SINCE IT IS CONSIDERED SUFFICIENT THAT THE ACT WAS COMMITTED BY TWO PEOPLE IN TERMS OF THE OCCURRENCE OF A MASS SMUGGLING CRIME, THE DEFENDANTS' SENTENCES SHOULD BE...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
3.Criminal Department
Base: 2016/11885
Decision: 2016/15033
Date of Decision: 28.06.2016
INTENTIONAL INJURY CRIME – THE DEFENDANT WHO IS UNDERSTOOD NOT TO HAVE COMPLETED THE AGE OF FIFTEEN AT THE TIME OF THE CRIME - ALTHOUGH A DISCOUNT SHOULD BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
3.Criminal Department
Base: 2015/34137
Decision: 2016/15145
Date of Decision: 28.06.2016
SIMPLE INJURY OFFENSE – THE NEED TO APPLY A MINIMUM REDUCTION IN THE DEFENDANT'S SENTENCE – INCOMPLETE DETERMINATION OF PUNISHMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANT BY APPLYING A DISCOUNT AT THE WRONG RATE – NO...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
15.law office
Base: 2013/6434
Decision: 2014/273
Date of Decision: 15.01.2014
A CASE ARISING FROM A WORK CONTRACT – IN WHICH THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY WAIVES THE CASE – IN WHICH THE PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY IS AUTHORIZED TO WAIVE THE CASE IN HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
2.law office
Base: 2003/11723
Decision: 2004/732
Date of Decision: 22.01.2004
REVOCATION OF INHERITANCE – IF THE RENUNCIATION AGREEMENT IS URGENT, IT WILL ALSO BE GRANTED TO THE FURU, UNLESS ITS CALIPHATE IS REQUIRED – THE TITLE OF HEIR - THE TRANSITION OF INHERITANCE...