General Archives - Page 15 of 163 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
1
archive,paged,category,category-genel,category-1,paged-15,category-paged-15,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
13.law office
Base: 2015/7350
Decision: 2015/31650
Date of Decision: 03.11.2015
CASE OF RECEIVABLES – THE COURT MUST FIRST EXAMINE AND EVALUATE ALL THE REASONS FOR THE DISMISSAL THAT THE DEFENDANTS HAVE REPORTED, INCLUDING THE TRIAL STAGE, AND MAKE A DECISION BASED ON THE...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
13.law office
Base: 2015/2853
Decision: 2016/7239
Date of Decision: 08.03.2016
CASE OF RECEIVABLES – THE NEED TO OBTAIN A REPORT FROM AN EXPERT WITNESS CONSIDERING THAT THE PLAINTIFF HAS BEEN UNFAIRLY DISMISSED BY THE COURT - REFUSAL OF THE CASE IN TERMS OF...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
13.law office
Base: 2015/37944
Decision: 2015/34696
Date of Decision: 30.11.2015
THE CASE OF CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL – DUE TO THE DECISIVENESS OF WHETHER THE PARTIES ARE CREDITORS OF EACH OTHER BETWEEN THE PREVIOUS PERIOD AND THE CONTRACT PERIOD – A DETAILED EXPERT...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
16.law office
Base: 2015/5675
Decision: 2015/13516
Date of Decision: 17.11.2015
CASE OF CANCELLATION AND REGISTRATION OF TITLE DEEDS – THE EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE DECISION IS BASED AND THERE IS NO ERROR IN THE DISCRETION OF THE EVIDENCE – APPEALS ARE NOT IN...
SUPREME COURT 11. Criminal Department Base: 2014/2326, Decision: 2014/2512
On 09/12/2013 day and 25/12/2013 day and PUK, organized by the Prosecutor General's Office of the Supreme Court in reference to the request of the General Directorate of Criminal Affairs of the Ministry of Justice to overturn...
SUPREME COURT 11. Criminal Department, Base: 2013/11074 , Decision: 2013/8061
02/05/2013 day and PUK organized by the Prosecutor General's Office of the Supreme Court of the Ministry of Justice on 15/04/2013 days and 2013/5880/24325 days in reference to the request to overturn for the benefit of...
SUPREME COURT 11. Criminal Department No: 2013/4394, K: 2013/3766
24/12/2012 day and 23/01/2013 day and PUK organized by the Prosecutor General's Office of the Supreme Court in reference to the request of the General Directorate of Criminal Affairs of the Ministry of Justice to overturn the...
T.C THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
21.law office
Base: 2018/ 613
Decision: 2019 / 262
Date of Decision: 21.01.2019
Case: A) Plaintiff's Request:
The plaintiff has requested that the notification of the payment order is irregular, that the enforcement proceedings initiated against him be stopped and that the foreclosure placed...
T.C THE SUPREME COURT
21.law office
Base: 2018/ 6938
Decision: 2019 / 177
Date of Decision: 17.01.2019
A) Plaintiff's Request:
The case is related to the request to decide on the determination of the insurance start date as 01/05/1985.
B) Respondent's Response:
In summary, the defendant's deputy of the Social Security Institution; this...
T.C THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
9.law office
Base: 2017/ 17885
Decision: 2019 / 1250
Date of Decision: 16.01.2019
Case: Examination of the decision made as a result of the lawsuit between the parties on appeal defendant T. Dec.C. ...
