General Archives - Page 15 of 163 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
1
archive,paged,category,category-genel,category-1,paged-15,category-paged-15,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,no_animation_on_touch,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

General

23 Feb

Posted at 21:10h in General, INFORMATION by
0 Likes

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 13.law office Base: 2015/7350 Decision: 2015/31650 Date of Decision: 03.11.2015 CASE OF RECEIVABLES – THE COURT MUST FIRST EXAMINE AND EVALUATE ALL THE REASONS FOR THE DISMISSAL THAT THE DEFENDANTS HAVE REPORTED, INCLUDING THE TRIAL STAGE, AND MAKE A DECISION BASED ON THE...

23 Feb

Posted at 21:08h in General, INFORMATION by
0 Likes

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 13.law office Base: 2015/2853 Decision: 2016/7239 Date of Decision: 08.03.2016 CASE OF RECEIVABLES – THE NEED TO OBTAIN A REPORT FROM AN EXPERT WITNESS CONSIDERING THAT THE PLAINTIFF HAS BEEN UNFAIRLY DISMISSED BY THE COURT - REFUSAL OF THE CASE IN TERMS OF...

22 Feb

Posted at 12:48h in General, INFORMATION by
0 Likes

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 13.law office Base: 2015/37944 Decision: 2015/34696 Date of Decision: 30.11.2015 THE CASE OF CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL – DUE TO THE DECISIVENESS OF WHETHER THE PARTIES ARE CREDITORS OF EACH OTHER BETWEEN THE PREVIOUS PERIOD AND THE CONTRACT PERIOD – A DETAILED EXPERT...

22 Feb

Posted at 12:45h in General, INFORMATION by
0 Likes

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 16.law office Base: 2015/5675 Decision: 2015/13516 Date of Decision: 17.11.2015 CASE OF CANCELLATION AND REGISTRATION OF TITLE DEEDS – THE EVIDENCE ON WHICH THE DECISION IS BASED AND THERE IS NO ERROR IN THE DISCRETION OF THE EVIDENCE – APPEALS ARE NOT IN...

22 Feb

Posted at 12:41h in General, INFORMATION by
0 Likes

SUPREME COURT 11. Criminal Department Base: 2014/2326, Decision: 2014/2512 On 09/12/2013 day and 25/12/2013 day and PUK, organized by the Prosecutor General's Office of the Supreme Court in reference to the request of the General Directorate of Criminal Affairs of the Ministry of Justice to overturn...

19 Feb

Posted at 19:06h in General, INFORMATION by
0 Likes

SUPREME COURT 11. Criminal Department No: 2013/4394, K: 2013/3766 24/12/2012 day and 23/01/2013 day and PUK organized by the Prosecutor General's Office of the Supreme Court in reference to the request of the General Directorate of Criminal Affairs of the Ministry of Justice to overturn the...

19 Feb

Posted at 00:21h in General, INFORMATION by
0 Likes

T.C THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 21.law office Base: 2018/ 613 Decision: 2019 / 262 Date of Decision: 21.01.2019 Case: A) Plaintiff's Request: The plaintiff has requested that the notification of the payment order is irregular, that the enforcement proceedings initiated against him be stopped and that the foreclosure placed...

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran