General Archives - Page 14 of 163 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
1
archive,paged,category,category-genel,category-1,paged-14,category-paged-14,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
T.C THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
6.Criminal Department
Base: 2016/ 5144
Decision: 2017 / 411
Date of Decision: 20.02.2017
Case and Verdict: The verdict given by the Local Court was appealed by the defendants ...
TO THE FAMILY COURT
PLAINTIFF:
TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER :
attorney :
address :
DEFENDANT :
address :
SUBJECT : It is About Our Request to Issue a Family Housing Comment.
INSTRUCTIONS
1-) Our client and the defendant ...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
22.law office
Base: 2013/17991
Decision: 2014/28823
Date of Decision: 23.10.2014
CASE OF LABOR RECEIVABLES – THE PLAINTIFF HAS NOT RESIGNED – THE PLAINTIFF HAS SIGNED THE DOCUMENT COMPULSORILY TO RECEIVE UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS - THE PLAINTIFF'S EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT CANNOT BE PROVED BY THE EMPLOYER...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
9.law office
Base: 2012/16304
Decision: 2014/20516
Date of Decision: 19.06.2014
CASE OF LABOR RECEIVABLES – THE NEED TO DECIDE ON THE LEGAL INTEREST FROM THE DATE OF THE EMPLOYER'S DEFAULT OR THE DATE OF THE CASE – THE APPLICATION OF THE HIGHEST DEPOSIT...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
22.law office
Base: 2014/19136
Decision: 2014/23067
Date of Decision: 08.09.2014
CASE OF EMPLOYEE RECEIVABLES – THE PLAINTIFF DEFAULTED ON THE EMPLOYER IN TERMS OF THE SAID RECEIVABLES – THE OPERATION OF THE HIGHEST INTEREST APPLIED TO DEPOSITS BY BANKS FROM THE DATE OF...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
6.Criminal Department
Base: 2012/16384
Decision: 2014/22169
Date of Decision: 15.12.2014
LOOTING CRIME – IN THE INCIDENT, IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE ACCUSED ESCAPED FROM THE HANDS OF THE COMPLAINANT AND FLED THE SCENE ALONG WITH THE OTHER MONEY THEY RECEIVED, EXCEPT FOR THE...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
6.Criminal Department
Base: 2012/11903
Decision: 2014/20394
Date of Decision: 24.11.2014
PLUNDER CRIME – WHEN THE VICTIM PUTS THE HANDBAG WITH MONEY AND CARDS IN THE BAG, WHILE THE DEFENDANT CONTINUES TO PULL THE BAG, THE VICTIM FALLS TO THE GROUND AND IS INJURED...
T.C THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
19.law office
Base: 2017/ 1359
Decision: 2018 / 3439
Date of Decision: 20.06.2018
At the end of the trial conducted in accordance with the deconstruction of the case of a negative determination between the parties, the file was examined, the need to be...
T.C THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
15.Criminal Department
Base: 2017/ 35155
Decision: 2018 / 1282
Date of Decision: 26.02.2018
The suspects of the crime of forgery and breach of trust ...
T.C THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
15.Criminal Department
Base: 2016/ 199
Decision: 2018 / 530
Date of Decision: 18.01.2018
Case: Defendant ...