General Archives - Page 11 of 163 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
1
archive,paged,category,category-genel,category-1,paged-11,category-paged-11,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
T.C.
SUPREME COURT
23. CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT
Base No:2015/7781
Decision No :2016/5875
THE DECISION EXAMINED;
COURT OF CASSATION : Criminal Court of Cassation
CRIME : Abuse of trust due to service
PROVISION : Twice: TCK's 155/2, 62, 52/2-4, 53. 1 year 8 months imprisonment and a judicial fine of 1,000 TL in accordance with...
T.C.
THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
11. CD
Base. 2008/21718
Decision. 2011/21383 Date. 2.11.2011
CASE : The case was examined and considered as necessary:
VERDICT: “...
TC.
THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
7. CD
BASE 2014/2954 DECISION 2014/14281 DATED 08.07.2014
CASE: F. For the act of violating Article 51/2-b of the Road Traffic Code No. 2918. A. about Alaşehir Traffic Control Unit dated 27/05/2013 and GT- The record of decision administrative fines applied with...
11.Criminal Dep. Base number: 2007/6709, Decision number: 2007/6012.
At the end of the trial of Cesur, accused of forgery and qualified fraud in official documents: BAKIRKÖY 1 on his conviction. 13.02.2007 day and 2006/221 Basis issued by the Heavy Criminal Court, as the defendant and the...
T.C.
THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT
Base. 2016/8672
Decision. 2018/8955
Date. 17.9.2018
The abandonment of the trade the Trader ( trade debtor primarily from the tax office where the company is registered encumbrance asked whether the defendant is competent or trade continued and whether there were left in...
T.C.
THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
law office
Base. 2015/20572
Decision. 2018/1190
Date. 24.1.2018
LABOR RECEIVABLES ( the prosecutor, the witness Witness to each other they are, and witness statements was made on the basis of the calculations it is understood/and people who claim to be working together in the...
T.C.
THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
law office
Base 2016/33150
Decision. 2017/21641
Date. 18.12.2017
THE CONDITION FOR PAYING COMPENSATIONS USING THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SUPERIORITY OF THE EMPLOYER
REQUESTING THE EMPLOYEE TO SUBMIT A WRITTEN RESIGNATION PETITION WITH SIMILAR PRESSURES (The EMPLOYEE is ENTITLED to
If He Complies, There Can be No...
Posted at 22:30h
in
General
by Yağız Canseven
T.C.
THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
law office
Base. 2016/33150
Decision 2017/21641
Date 18.12.2017
THE CONDITION FOR PAYING COMPENSATIONS USING THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SUPERIORITY OF THE EMPLOYER
REQUESTING THE EMPLOYEE TO SUBMIT A WRITTEN RESIGNATION PETITION WITH SIMILAR PRESSURES (The EMPLOYEE is ENTITLED to
If He Complies, There Can be No...
T.C.
THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT
Base: 2016/1417
Decision 2017/6429
Date 19.9.2017
INDICATES THAT THERE IS A PROHIBITION OF OVERTAKING, CAUSING AN ACCIDENT BY OVERTAKING THE VEHICLE IN FRONT OF IT DESPITE THE STRAIGHT LANE LINE AND THE PROHIBITION OF OVERTAKING SIGN (The Defendant's Action is Conscious
Acceptance of...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
19.law office
Base: 2016/537
Decision: 2016/10689
Date of Decision: 14.06.2016
CASE OF REPLACEMENT OF DEFECTIVE GOODS – THE EXPERT REPORT ON THE DEDUCTION OF THE PRICE IS NOT BASED ON ADEQUATE EXAMINATION AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR AUDIT – THE INADEQUACY OF THE...