General Archives - Page 10 of 163 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE

Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.

alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz

archive,paged,category,category-genel,category-1,paged-10,category-paged-10,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive

General

19 Mar ALONG WITH THE DECISION TO BE MADE ON NON-DUTY FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE JUDICIAL PATH, A PROVISION SHOULD BE MADE IN TERMS OF TUITION FEES AND PROXY FEES – THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT

Posted at 00:48h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME COURT 4. DEPARTMENT OF LAW Base. 2016/11329, Decision. 2017/1197, Date. 28.2.2017 REQUEST FOR FINANCIAL COMPENSATION DUE TO UNFAIR ACTION (A Decision on ”Non-Duty in Terms of Judicial Means" Will be Made, As Well as a Provision in Terms of Tuition Fees and Power of...

19 Mar REFUSAL OF AN EVICTION REQUEST MADE BEFORE THE EXPIRATION OF A 30-DAY PAYMENT PERIOD- SUPREME COURT DECISION

Posted at 00:44h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. COURT OF CASSATION 6. DEPARTMENT OF LAW Base. 2015/10497, Decision. 2016/2720, Date. 4.4.2016 • REMOVAL OF THE OBJECTION TO THE ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS INITIATED FOR THE COLLECTION OF THE LEASE RECEIVABLE AND THE EVICTION CASE (IT IS ERRONEOUS THAT THE OBJECTION HAS BEEN COMPLETELY REMOVED DUE...

16 Mar THE CRIME OF THEFT- THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT

Posted at 21:29h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 2. Criminal Department Base: 2018 / 6747 Decision: 2019 / 1146 Date of Decision: 28.01.2019 COURT : Criminal Court of First Instance CRIME : Theft, resisting arrest SENTENCE : Conviction The file was examined and considered as necessary; 1- Hunting in accordance with the provisions of the...

16 Mar THE DECISION OF THE MORTAR-SUPREME COURT IN THE EVICTION CASE

Posted at 21:26h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 6. law office Base No:2015/7088 Decision No:2015/9126 Date:27.10.2015 COURT : Kashan Magistrate's Court DATE : 27/01/2015 NUMBER : 2014/612-2015/40 The decision on the eviction and receivable (rent receivable) case, the date and number of which are written above, issued from the local court, was appealed...

16 Mar COMMITTING THE CRIME OF USURY MORE THAN ONCE AND AGAINST MORE THAN ONE PERSON – THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT

Posted at 21:23h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 5. CD Base. 2014/5743 Decision. 2014/6848 Date19.6.2014 CASE : M., accused of loan sharking. Sh.in accordance with Article 241/1 of the Turkish Criminal Code No. 5237. in accordance with article ( three times) of the Decision of the Criminal Court of...

15 Mar PLANTING TWENTY ROOT CANNABIS PLANTS IS CONSIDERED PERSONAL USE – SUPREME COURT DECISION

Posted at 23:10h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. Supreme Court 10. Criminal Department Base No: 2011/26440, Decision No:2017/317, Decision. Date:3.2.2017 Crime : Planting canabis Date of Offense : 07/06/2005 Sentence : Conviction for growing plants that produce the effect of drugs or stimulants for use by him The Appellant : The defendant's defense The file has been...

15 Mar THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE ABSOLUTE PRICES IS NOT PROOF OF DECENCY – THE SUPREME COURT DECISION

Posted at 23:01h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

Court of Cassation 1. Department of Law Base No. 2013/21711, Decision No. 2014/11276 “text of jurisprudence” COURT: GERMENCIK COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE DATE : 06/19/2013 NUMBER : 2012/19-2013/442 The decision made by the local court at the end of the deed cancellation and registration case between the parties regarding the...

14 Mar SUPREME COURT DECISION ON THE FACT THAT ALL INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS IN THE FILE SHOULD BE SENT TO THE PRESIDENCY OF THE TURKISH COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY IN ORDER TO DETECT MESSAGES BY ELECTRONIC MAIL

Posted at 14:43h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 4. CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT 2011/7577 Base, 2013/11425 Decision, Dated 15.4.2013 INSULT (By E-Mail – All the Information and Documents in the File will be Sent to the Head of the Turkish Communications Authority for the Detection of Messages) THREAT (By E-Mail – In Order to...

12 Mar EMBEZZLEMENT & ABUSE OF TRUST- SUPREME COURT DECISION

Posted at 22:17h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 5. CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT Base No:2012/12683 Decision No :2014/47 Date : 5. Criminal Department 2012/12683 E. , 2014/47 K. “text of jurisprudence” Communiqué No: 15 – 2012/42078 COURT : Uskudar 2. (Istanbul Anatolia 6.) Severe Criminal Court DATE : 16/11/2009 NUMBER : Based on 2009/319, The Decision of 2009/397 CRIME :...

12 Mar OFFENSE OF ABUSE OF TRUST DUE TO SERVICE

Posted at 22:13h in General by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME 15. CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT Base No :2013/6703 Decision No :2014/21867 Decision Date : Communiqué No: 15 – 2011/321452 COURT : Eskişehir 5. Criminal Court of First Instance DATE : 08/12/2010 NUMBER : 2010/81(E) and 2010/890(K) CRIME : Abuse of trust due to service The file was examined and considered as necessary; In order for the crime...

General

19 Mar ALONG WITH THE DECISION TO BE MADE ON NON-DUTY FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE JUDICIAL PATH, A PROVISION SHOULD BE MADE IN TERMS OF TUITION FEES AND PROXY FEES – THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT

19 Mar REFUSAL OF AN EVICTION REQUEST MADE BEFORE THE EXPIRATION OF A 30-DAY PAYMENT PERIOD- SUPREME COURT DECISION

16 Mar THE CRIME OF THEFT- THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT

16 Mar THE DECISION OF THE MORTAR-SUPREME COURT IN THE EVICTION CASE

16 Mar COMMITTING THE CRIME OF USURY MORE THAN ONCE AND AGAINST MORE THAN ONE PERSON – THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT

15 Mar PLANTING TWENTY ROOT CANNABIS PLANTS IS CONSIDERED PERSONAL USE – SUPREME COURT DECISION

15 Mar THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE ABSOLUTE PRICES IS NOT PROOF OF DECENCY – THE SUPREME COURT DECISION

14 Mar SUPREME COURT DECISION ON THE FACT THAT ALL INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS IN THE FILE SHOULD BE SENT TO THE PRESIDENCY OF THE TURKISH COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY IN ORDER TO DETECT MESSAGES BY ELECTRONIC MAIL

12 Mar EMBEZZLEMENT & ABUSE OF TRUST- SUPREME COURT DECISION

12 Mar OFFENSE OF ABUSE OF TRUST DUE TO SERVICE

Address

Phone

E-Mail