General Archives - Page 5 of 163 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
1
archive,paged,category,category-genel,category-1,paged-5,category-paged-5,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
T.C. SUPREME COURT
1.law office
Base: 2014/11142
Decision: 2016/7262
Date of Decision: 14.06.2016
land registry
CASE OF CANCELLATION AND REGISTRATION OF TITLE DEEDS – DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE PROVISIONS OF SHARED OWNERSHIP WILL BE APPLIED IN DISPUTES BETWEEN HEIRS AND EACH OTHER AND THAT THEY CAN BE SUED WITH...
T.C.
SUPREME CORT
11. law office
Base No:2012/10984 Decision No:2014/2469 K. Date:13.2.2014
In the case dec between the parties, Antalya 1. A judicial review of the decision No. 08/12/2011 and 2007/4-2011/481 issued by the Commercial Court of First Instance was requested by the deputy plaintiff, and on 11.02.2014, determined...
T.C. SUPREME COURT
8.law office
Base: 2013/223
Decision: 2013/9173
Date of Decision: 13.06.2013
CASE OF CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL – FOLLOW-UP INITIATED DUE TO RECEIVABLES ARISING FROM THE LIQUIDATION OF THE GOODS REGIME – WITHDRAWAL OF ALL THE MONEY IN THE BANK ACCOUNT BY ONE OF THE JOINT ACCOUNT HOLDERS...
“T.C.
ISTANBUL
9. TAX COURT
ISSUE NO : 908/2014
DECISION NO : 2014/1704
SUMMARY OF THE CASE: Istanbul Başakşehir, Ikitelli Mah. No Name 1 1342.1 no Lu name and 1343.lu plots registered in March 2014 due to construction in the period of record sales operations relating to real estate for...
T.C. SUPREME COURT
General Assembly of Law
Base: 2013/18-1628
Decision: 2015/894
Date of Decision: 04.03.2015
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT CASE – THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN COURT DECISIONS ON AN ISSUE WITHIN THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF TURKISH COURTS CANNOT BE DECIDED – THE REJECTION OF THE CASE – THE NEED...
T.C. SUPREME COURT
18.law office
Base on: 2013/18352
Decision: 2014/4459
Date of Decision: 11.03.2014
RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT CASE – EVEN IF THE PARTIES ARE NOT TURKISH CITIZENS, THEY CAN REQUEST THE RECOGNITION OR RECOGNITION OF A FOREIGN NAME PROVIDED THAT THEY HAVE LEGAL INTERESTS - IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADOPTION...
T.C. SUPREME COURT
2.law office
Base on: 2011/13681
Decision: 2012/6879
Date of Decision: 22.03.2012
REQUEST TO ISSUE A GUARDIANSHIP DECISION WITH RESTRICTION – DETERMINATION OF THE NATIONAL LAW OF THE ONE WHO WANTS TO BE RESTRICTED BY USING THE PLAINTIFF'S ASSISTANCE – THE NEED TO INVESTIGATE WHETHER IT IS POSSIBLE...
….. EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE GUARD,
THE COMPLAINANT
(DEBTOR) : DEPUTY :
THE OTHER SIDE : ...
Posted at 23:45h
in
General
by Yağız Canseven
TO THE ...
T.C. SUPREME COURT
14.law office
Base: 2014/3367
Decision: 2015/1576
Date of Decision: 16.02.2015
REQUEST FOR PREVENTION OF WATER ELIMINATION - THE NEEDS OF THE PARTIES FOR WATER THE RATE OF INFLUENCE OF WELLS ON EACH OTHER WHETHER THE WATER WILL RETURN TO ITS FORMER LEVEL IF THE DEFENDANT'S WELL IS...