alanya Archives - Page 154 of 223 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
217
archive,paged,tag,tag-alanya,tag-217,paged-154,tag-paged-154,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

alanya Tag

20 Feb

Posted at 23:38h in General by
0 Likes

... FAMILY COURT JUDGE CONTESTED : TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : ADDRESS : Deputy : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) ADDRESS : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) Subject: our objections to a daily detention of coercion for non-compliance with a decision to remove him from the House. INSTRUCTIONS : 1 -) our...

20 Feb

Posted at 23:14h in General by
0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME 5.Legal Department Basis: 2016/3179 Verdict: 2016/11873 Decision Date: 14.06.2016 CASE FOR DETERMINATION OF THE EXPROPRIATION PRICE – THE EXPROPRIATION PRICE DETERMINED AFTER THE VIOLATION IS THE SAME AS THE PRICE STIPULATED BY THE FIRST DECISION – THE ENTIRE EXPROPRIATION PRICE IS PAID TO THE DEFENDANT-LEGAL INTEREST SHOULD BE...

20 Feb

Posted at 23:11h in General by
0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME 20.Legal Department Mainly: 2015/7834 Decision: 2016/7381 Decision Date: 22.06.2016 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES – CLAIM FOR DAMAGES CAUSED BY THE RETENTION OF THE LAND REGISTRY – RE-INVESTIGATION AND EVALUATION OF WHETHER REAL ESTATE CAN BE CONSIDERED IN THE LAND QUALITY – FAILURE TO ESTABLISH A PROVISION BASED ON INCOMPLETE...

20 Feb

Posted at 23:08h in General by
0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME 4.Legal Department Basis: 2015/16555 Decision: 2016/8360 Decision Date: 27.06.2016 REQUEST FOR REMOVAL OF FORECLOSURE – ACQUISITION OF REAL ESTATE BEFORE REGISTRATION – THE DECISION TO REGISTER IS NOT A CONSTITUENT TRANSACTION, BUT A DECLARATIVE TRANSACTION – THE FAILURE OF THE DECISION TO REJECT THE REQUEST – THE PROVISION...

20 Feb

Posted at 23:04h in General by
0 Likes

..... TO THE JUDGE OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE PLAINTIFF : TC IDENTIFICATION NUMBER : ADDRESS : Deputy : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) ADDRESS : (Legal representatives of the parties, if any) DEFENDANT : Address : Subject: expropriation law No. 2942 10. according to the article, it consists of a request...

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran