alanya Archives - Page 148 of 223 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
217
archive,paged,tag,tag-alanya,tag-217,paged-148,tag-paged-148,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

alanya Tag

T.C. SUPREME 2.Legal Department Basis: 2016/13586 Verdict: 2016/12490 Decision Date: 28.06.2016 DIVORCE CASE – WHERE THE HEIRS OF THE DEFENDANT HAVE THE RIGHT TO PROCEED WITH THE CASE – THE WAIVER OF THE PLAINTIFF WILL NOT RESULT IN A PROVISION – THE NEED TO DETERMINE THE CASES OF DEFECTS OF...

227 of TCK No. 5237. according to the article, the crimes punishable by being considered as a crime of prostitution are as follows: Offence of incitement to prostitution (TCK 227/2), Crime of facilitating prostitution (TCK 227/2), Crime of mediating prostitution (TCK 227/2), Crime of providing a place for prostitution...

T.C. SUPREME 3.Legal Department Basis: 2016/5899 Verdict: 2016/10153 Decision Date: 27.06.2016 A CASE FOR INCREASING CHILD SUPPORT-THE FACT THAT THE OUT-OF-COURT FATHER COVERS THE PLAINTIFF'S EXPENSES, AS WELL AS PAYS CHILD SUPPORT FOR OTHER COMMON CHILDREN WHOSE CUSTODY IS IN THE DEFENDANT – VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION Abstract: the court; the...

T.C. SUPREME 15.Legal Department Basis: 2016/1046 Decision: 2016/3719 Decision Date: 28.06.2016 A CASE FOR COLLECTING A PENALTY FOR DELAY ARISING FROM THE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE WORK CONTRACT – IT IS LEGALLY POSSIBLE FOR THE PLAINTIFF TO REQUEST INTEREST BY RECLAMATION – FAILURE TO REJECT THE INTEREST REQUEST WITH CONTRARY CONSIDERATIONS...

T.C. SUPREME 2.Legal Department Mainly: 2015/16048 Verdict: 2016/12667 Decision Date: 29.06.2016 DIVORCE CASE – STATEMENTS OF PLAINTIFF WITNESSES ARE STATEMENTS TRANSFERRED FROM THE PLAINTIFF AND CANNOT BE BASED ON THE VERDICT – THE PLAINTIFF CANNOT PROVE THAT THE TRAPPINGS WERE CASHED BY THE DEFENDANT – VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION Summary: The...

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran