AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE | THE DECISION OF THE CRIMINAL GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE PENALTY FOR VIOLATION OF THE OBLIGATION
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
19492
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-19492,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.4.7,vc_responsive
 

THE DECISION OF THE CRIMINAL GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE PENALTY FOR VIOLATION OF THE OBLIGATION

THE DECISION OF THE CRIMINAL GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE PENALTY FOR VIOLATION OF THE OBLIGATION

General Assembly of the Supreme Criminal, dated 09.10.2001 and dated 2001-16-181 base. 2001/200 decision. in his decision ;

“….it is obligatory that the total amount payable by the debtor in the obligation to pay for the occurrence of the offense of violation of the obligation is clearly indicated in numerical form, and the parties must agree and agree on this amount. Although the amount of debt is specified in the follow-up request, this is not enough, and during the commitment, the interest, power of attorney fees, executive fees and expenses that will be processed and processed should be determined, and thus the amount based on the borrower’s commitment should be determined. If this amount is not determined, criminal liability will not arise in case of violation of the payment condition, since the acceptance of this obligation, for which amount the borrower has made a commitment, cannot be determined without giving doubt what amount was made by taking into account the evil eye, in case of violation of the payment condition. he must leave, otherwise a verdict of acquittal must be established for his intentional absence.”

No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran