alanya Archives - Page 70 of 223 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
217
archive,paged,tag,tag-alanya,tag-217,paged-70,tag-paged-70,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

alanya Tag

T.C SUPREME COURT 15.Legal Department, Base: 2017/ 4843 Decision: 2019 / 2993 Decision Date: 26.06.2019 ABSTRACT: The court cannot prove the claim that the plaintiff's performance has become impossible without the fault of the contract itself, the defendant decommissioned the power of attorney so that the...

T.C SUPREME COURT 8.Legal Department Base: 2018/ 14999 Decision: 2018 / 18937 Decision Date: 20.11.2018 ABSTRACT: The case is related to the request to remove the objection to the follow-up initiated for the collection of the lease receivable. There is no dispute between the parties regarding...

T.C SUPREME COURT 13.Legal Department, Base: 2017/ 3657 Decision: 2018 / 10801 Decision Date: 19.11.2018 SUMMARY: The documents in the court's file, the situation where the zoning plan of the place where the transformer is being moved has been canceled, and the provisions of the contract...

T.C SUPREME COURT 15.Department of Law, Base: 2018/ 2380 Decision: 2018 / 1912 Decision Date: 14.05.2018 SUMMARY: a subcontracting agreement between the parties dated 13.03.2012 arranged in accordance with the cost of the plaintiff in the construction of the work; according to the expert report received...

T.C SUPREME COURT 19.Legal Department, Base: 2016/ 9422 Decision: 2018 / 1089 Decision Date: 01.03.2018 ABSTRACT: It is not correct to base the legal interpretations in expert reports issued by the court in violation of the provisions of the contract and the law on the judgment....

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran