alanya Archives - Page 153 of 223 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
217
archive,paged,tag,tag-alanya,tag-217,paged-153,tag-paged-153,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

alanya Tag

T.C. SUPREME 6.Criminal Division Basis: 2015/4756 Decision: 2016/5637 Decision Date: 30.06.2016 THE OFFENCE OF THEFT-THE USE OF ELECTION AND OTHER POLITICAL RIGHTS-WAS ANNULLED AND THE PROVISION WAS CORRECTED AND UPHELD – Summary: the Constitutional Court's decision on 08.10.2015 day, 2014/140-2015/85, written in Article 53/1-B of the TCK, “election, election and other...

T.C. SUPREME 7.Criminal Division Basis: 2015/7404 Decision: 2016/9043 Decision Date: 30.06.2016 OFFENCE OF OPPOSITION TO LAW NO. 5607 – CANCELLATION OF SOME PARTS OF ARTICLE TCK BY THE DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, WHICH ENTERED INTO FORCE AFTER PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE – OBLIGATION TO RE-EVALUATE THE ARTICLE –...

T.C. SUPREME 15.Legal Department Basis: 2016/3350 Decision: 2016/3809 Decision Date: 12.07.2016 CREDIT CASE – IF FEES AND EXPENSES ARE NOT COMPLETED WITHIN THE GIVEN PERIOD, IT WILL BE DECIDED TO CONSIDER THE DECISION NOT APPEALED, AND THE HUMK ARTICLE WILL BE APPLIED IN COMPARISON TO THE APPEAL OF THE DECISION...

The other party must be notified of the situation before termination of employment contracts for an indefinite period. Employment contracts; a) for an employee whose work has taken less than six months, two weeks after the notification has been made to the other party, b) for an employee...

T.C. SUPREME 20.Legal Department Basis: 2016/8400 Decision: 2016/7557 Decision Date: 13.07.2016 Summary: After the rejected judge stated the opinion that the request should be rejected, the defendant who requested the refusal was rejected from the basis of the request by the merci who examined the file ...

T.C. SUPREME 15.Legal Department Basis: 2015/4549 Decision: 2016/3863 Decision Date: 14.07.2016 CASE FOR COLLECTION OF ASSIGNMENT RECEIVABLES – THE REQUIREMENT THAT FEES AND ATTORNEY FEES IN CASES BE RULED AS A VICTIM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINIMUM ATTORNEY WAGE TARIFF – THE BANKRUPTCY TABLE IS HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RELATIVE...

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran