How Does It Prove in The Case Of Divorce Because Of Deception? - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
16221
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-16221,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

How Does It Prove in The Case Of Divorce Because Of Deception?

How Does It Prove in The Case Of Divorce Because Of Deception?

Human life, which has been evaluated in a wide range of axis from the first ages to the present day, is a concrete planning options at a glance of the cultural, social and environmental lifestyles. perhaps after the centuries have not expressed the existence of the value of the judiciary is losing their essence.

The elimination of marriage and relationships in recent times, deception, deception, with one of the authorities is defined as an immoral moral action, in honor, we will look at the nature of a kind of Turkish society, here is the issue of honor and honor, a person who desires to qualify their dignity.

Decrease in emotional dependence, loss of loyalty, and deprivation in one of the situations according to the lack of preference of those who are close to each other when I live together in life, is the cause of an absolute order in the 161st article of the Turkish Civil Code, which is 4721 years old. According to this, if one of the spouses commits, the other wife can do the divorce can do deception. Beginning with the knowledge of the right to divorce six months ago and after six months at the beginning of the act of adultery in the beginning of the right to the case is falling and forgive the party wants the right to the case.

When it was seen, the lawmaker was clearly stated that the deceased wife had the right to file for divorce. However, here is a clear attitude to divorce, the judge’s adultery there is not enough to judge the divorce, the result of the request to be born before the court had to be the result of the request.

People who are aware of the action of being able to clear the cheating, that is, because of human nature, when I want it, the deceitful wife proves there are some difficulties. Persons, without the law to obtain the provision of this action will prove the existence of photos, videos, sms records, lover-written letters, social networking sites in the meantime, such as movements can provide all kinds of documents as evidence to order. Nevertheless, witnesses are likely to be deceived by true and true statements, and the fact that they are supported by other evidences also has a full effect.

What you want to say is that when the action of the act of adultery, which is stipulated by the law, has started for six months and at the beginning of the action, the request for the adoption of the divorce case will be filed on the basis of the reasons for the periods of the fifth year. In addition, there is a clear or implicit difference that the deceived spouse forgives, which is the close convincing evidence or witness statements that it presents in the form of a clear behavior, the meaning of which decides to divorce, based on the judge’s reason to deceive. All the evidence is overridden by the time-honored deadlines or the forgiveness of the deceived spouse.

No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran