Aşıkoğlu Law Office, Author at AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE - Page 100 of 121
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
3
archive,paged,author,author-asikoglu-law-office,author-3,paged-100,author-paged-100,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

Author: Aşıkoğlu Law Office

Supreme Court 17. Legal Department 2016/15663 E. 2017/7899 K. Court :Court of First Instance At the end of the trial of the compensation case between the parties, the case was reviewed and considered necessary upon appeal by the plaintiff's attorney within the period of the decision given for the...

T.O SUPREME 21. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2016/19742 DECISION NO: 2018/2740 DECISION DATE: 22.03.2018 Tribunal :Employment Tribunal >WORKER SERVICE IDENTIFICATION CASE, THE CASE FILE OF LABOR CLAIMS IN TERMS OF SERVICE IDENTIFICATION REQUEST IS STRONG EVIDENCE AND IS NOT CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE. The plaintiff requested that the work of the defendant's employer be determined...

T.C. SUPREME 19. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2016/11600 DECISION NO: 2018/441 DECISION DATE: 7.2.2018 >SIGNATURE OBJECTION-THE NEED FOR SIGNATURE SAMPLES TO BE TAKEN BEFORE THE PARTIES AT THE HEARING–SIGNATURE SAMPLES TO BE MADE AFTER THE HEARING BY DECISIONREFERENCES 2004 / m.72 Summary Dec Dec.1 after hearing in the court dated 23.01.2014 with the...

T.O SUPREME 2. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2016/16665 DECISION NO: 2018/5562 DECISION DATE: 25.04.2018 Court: Family Court Case type: divorce THE WOMAN WHO IS WORKING AND HAS A PERMANENT INCOME IS NOT ENTITLED TO ALIMONY. At the end of the judgment of the case between the parties given by the Local Court, the verdict...

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran