Aşıkoğlu Law Office, Author at AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE - Page 5 of 121
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
3
archive,paged,author,author-asikoglu-law-office,author-3,paged-5,author-paged-5,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
Author: Aşıkoğlu Law Office
T.C. SUPREME
7.Criminal Division
Basis: 2014/30174
Decision: 2016/9031
Decision Date: 30.06.2016
CRIME OF OPPOSITION TO LAW 4733 – REGISTRATION OF THE VEHICLE USED IN THE CRIME MALIKI WAS INFORMED OF THE CASE AND MADE A PROVISION WITH INCOMPLETE EXAMINATION WITHOUT RECEIVING A DECLARATION ON CONFISCATION – VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION
Summary:...
T.C. SUPREME
7.Criminal Division
Basis: 2015/7404
Decision: 2016/9043
Decision Date: 30.06.2016
OFFENCE OF OPPOSITION TO LAW NO. 5607 – CANCELLATION OF SOME PARTS OF ARTICLE TCK BY THE DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, WHICH ENTERED INTO FORCE AFTER PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE – OBLIGATION TO RE-EVALUATE THE ARTICLE –...
T.C. SUPREME
7.Criminal Division
Basis: 2016/10041
Decision: 2016/9083
Decision Date: 30.06.2016
CRIME OF ABUSE OF TRUST DUE TO SERVICE – FAILURE TO MAKE A POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE DECISION ON THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE-THE NEED TO BREAK THE PROVISION
Summary :TCK.in accordance with the article mentioned about the defendant, whose...
Supreme Court of the Republic of Turkey
8.Criminal Division
Basis: 2016/6617
Decision: 2016/8693
Decision Date: 30.06.2016
CRIME OF BANK OR CREDIT CARD ABUSE – DETERMINATION AND ASSESSMENT OF THE LEGAL SITUATION BY EVALUATING ALL THE EVIDENCE BY SHOWING THE CD IMAGES TO THE DEFENDANT AND ASKING IF THE PERSON IN...
T.C. SUPREME
6.Criminal Division
Mainly: 2015/4741
Decision: 2016/5636
Decision Date: 30.06.2016
CRIME OF THREATENING WITH A GUN – BY A DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, THE PHRASE WRITTEN IN THE ARTICLE OF THE TCK WAS CANCELED FOR THE USE OF ELECTION AND OTHER POLITICAL RIGHTS-CORRECTION AND APPROVAL OF THE PROVISION
Summary:...
Supreme Court Of The Republic Of Turkey
15.Legal Department
Basis: 2016/3094
Decision: 2016/3597
Decision Date: 21.06.2016
A CASE FOR THE CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL – IN WHICH BOTH PARTIES ARE MERCHANTS AND RELATE TO THE COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE OF THE PARTIES – VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION
Abstract: in a concrete dispute, the...
Supreme Court of the Republic of Turkey
20.Legal Department
Mainly: 2015/7834
Decision: 2016/7381
Decision Date: 22.06.2016
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES – CLAIM FOR DAMAGES CAUSED BY THE RETENTION OF THE LAND REGISTRY – RE-INVESTIGATION AND EVALUATION OF WHETHER REAL ESTATE CAN BE CONSIDERED IN THE LAND QUALITY – FAILURE TO ESTABLISH...
Supreme Court Of The Republic Of Turkey
20.Legal Department
Mainly: 2015/7808
Decision: 2016/7383
Decision Date: 22.06.2016
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES – CLAIM FOR DAMAGES CAUSED BY THE RETENTION OF THE LAND REGISTRY – RE-INVESTIGATION AND EVALUATION OF WHETHER REAL ESTATE CAN BE CONSIDERED IN THE LAND QUALITY – FAILURE TO ESTABLISH...
Supreme Court Of The Republic Of Turkey
3.Legal Department
Basis: 2016/8767
Verdict: 2016/10150
Decision Date: 27.06.2016
CASE OF TEMPORARY SUBSCRIPTION FACILITY – THE NEED TO PREPARE AN EXPERT REPORT AND MAKE AN APPROPRIATE DECISION ON WHETHER THE FENNI REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET – INCOMPLETE REVIEW – THE PROVISION HAS BEEN...
Supreme Court Of The Republic Of Turkey
22.Legal Department
Basis: 2015/6421
Decision: 2016/19279
Decision Date: 27.06.2016
CASE OF EMPLOYEE RECEIVABLES – TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP AS A PENSIONER – WHETHER THE DEBTS OF THE SPECIAL PROVINCIAL ADMINISTRATION, WHOSE LEGAL ENTITY WAS REMOVED, WERE TRANSFERRED TO ANY INSTITUTION BEFORE THE TRANSFER...
