Time To Report Evidence - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
16352
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-16352,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

Time To Report Evidence

18 Feb Time To Report Evidence

Posted at 15:09h in General by
0 Likes

The claimant is obliged to declare with the evidence that he will prove the facts with which he claims. The plaintiff should submit the documents at hand to the petition and provide information on where to bring the documents. (HMK art. 140/5.) If the subsequent assertion of an evidence does not aim to delay the proceedings or if it is not due to the fault of the party concerned, the court may allow the subsequent evidence to be shown. (YHGK, 20.04.2016, E. 2014 / 13-856, K. 2016/523 numbered decision) There is no possibility for the plaintiff who has not given any evidence in the exchange stage of the petition to be given new time in the preliminary hearing to give evidence.

The decision of the Supreme Court is as follows.

2. Legal Department 2015/19509 E., 2016/12319 K.

THE COURT: The Family Court
CASE TYPE: Divorce

At the end of the reasoning of the case between the parties given the court of the local court, the number of the date and number shown by the defendant woman appealed, the documents were read and considered as necessary:
The claimant is obliged to declare with the evidence that he will prove the facts with which he claims. The plaintiff should submit the documents at hand to the petition and provide information on where to bring the documents. (HMK art. 140/5.) If the subsequent assertion of an evidence does not aim to delay the proceedings or if it is not due to the fault of the party concerned, the court may allow the subsequent evidence to be shown. (YHGK, 20.04.2016, E. 2014 / 13-856, K. 2016/523 numbered decision) There is no possibility for the plaintiff who has not given any evidence in the exchange stage of the petition to be given new time in the preliminary hearing to give evidence. The plaintiff was not based on witness evidence in his male case-law. In the preliminary examination hearing on 11.11.2014, it was not true that the plaintiff had been given 2 weeks for the court to inform the court of the witnesses.
CONCLUSION: The reason given for the reason shown above, the reason for the reason of the appeal of appeal for the appeal of the objections of appeal for the present is not yet to be returned to the investor in return, 15 days from the notification of this decision, the decision was made by unanimous decision to be clear.

No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran