The Right To Terminate The Employer With Justified Reason - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
16126
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-16126,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

The Right To Terminate The Employer With Justified Reason

The Right To Terminate The Employer With Justified Reason

1-GENERAL

The right of immediate termination of the employer by the employer is regulated in Article 25 of Labor Law No. 4857. The related article regulates the reasons for the immediate termination of the employer under the required headings. these; (1) health reasons, (2) non-compliance with the rules of ethics and good governance, (3) coercive reasons, and (4) the possession or detention of the worker’s detention.

If you use the right of immediate termination of the employer’s rightful reason, the meaning of the employment contract related to labor or unemployment.

In Article 18 of the same law, the right of termination is governed by the employer. These conditions are regulated under two main headings in the law; (1) cause the employee’s competence or behavior, and (2) reputation, work or the necessity of work.

2-THE RIGHT TO TERMINATION

Recruitment Article 18 collects under two main headings whether the rights are valid or not.

The reasons for the worker’s competence or behavior are:
We can be divided into two groups: the inadequacy of the worker, the inadequacy of the worker physically and the inadequacy of the worker. To consider the worker’s illness, old age and retirement status from physical disability. Workers’ inadequacy of the worker is the lack of issues such as quick decision making and initiative. The Supreme Court of Appeals regarding occupational insufficiency, the worker himself and his employer as a work performance and performance situation is low and looked for the continuity of this situation.

Article 19/2 of the Labor Law means the written defense of the employee from the competence or behavior of the worker before the termination of the employment contract due to brain causes. The termination of the employment contract without the written defense of the employee shall not be considered as termination for a valid reason.

The reason for the necessity of business, workplace and work is:
This missile can not seize the tangible event in its termination. In general, however, there are basic criteria accepted by the Supreme Court. The termination of the work, the termination of work that caused the workplace and the necessity of the work was applied as a son remedy.

Termination of employment or contract, which is not possible to work in the workplace in a workplace or in any other workplace, is not accepted as a valid termination.

Workers should be tried all solutions, and all solutions should be tried.

3-RIGHTS DUE TO THE TERMS OF TERMINATION FOR TERMINATION

In the existing population dissolution, the right of termination of the labor law Article 25 and the right to terminate the employee’s labor contract, which is contrary to the behavior of the agenda.

Right of termination of the employer The scope of work order has the right to work safety within your workplace. Workplaces employing 30 or more workers have no minimum 6-month seniority and no employer’s representative.

Existing employment contracts, employment contracts, employment contracts, contracts are justified in Article 25 Sign. Providing the liberation of the worker’s behavior is the common point we deserve. The difference is the weight of the defect output.

To express that it is not expected to continue with the worker. In non-valid termination, justified, heavy, non, useless.

It will not be obliged to pay the indemnity compensation. However, the employment contract, employment contract, employment contract, employment contract, employment contract, employment contract, employment contract, employment contract, provision of employment contract.

4-TERM OF RIGHT TO USE

The termination period of the employer’s right to terminate the right of termination is limited to 6 working days in the dismissals of the employer under the Article 25 / II clause of the Labor Law.

The employer shall not exercise the right to terminate the contract on the basis of conditions which do not comply with the rules of morality and good faith, after 6 working days from the day on which the employee learns such behavior, and in any case not later than one year after the actual performance of the act. However, a one-year period is not applied if the employee makes a financial interest in the case.

Although the employer has the right to dismiss the employee for compensation for good reason, the employer will be entitled to compensate the worker for a valid reason instead of just dismissing the worker for compensation. The termination of the employment contract of the employee for the current reason will be required to be used within a, reasonable time ence after the termination of the employment.

We would like to note that there has not been any determination of the reasonable period in the law and that the reasonable time criterion of the Court of Cassation is examined separately by each case.

FINALLY;

For the justified reason explained above, the termination is also the reason for termination of the employment contract with the employer. Termination based on a valid reason does not contain as severe reasons as termination based on just cause. In both of the termination reasons the common point is defective, justified reason for termination in the termination due to the validity of the cause of the severity is more than the termination. In order to draw the limits of termination for the current reason, each concrete case will have to be examined separately and thus it becomes meaningful with the discretion of the judge.

No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran