THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE CRIME OF SLANDER - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
20824
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-20824,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE CRIME OF SLANDER

21 Mar THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE CRIME OF SLANDER

Posted at 23:04h in General, INFORMATION by
0 Likes

T.C.
Supreme Court
8. Criminal Department

Base No :2017/14038
Decision No :2018/1646
D. Date :19.2.2018

COURT : Criminal Court of First Instance
OFFENSE : Slander
SENTENCE : Conviction

It was discussed and considered as necessary:
For the crime of slander or make a complaint to the competent authorities occur in order to know that he didn’t commit by the report about them, the initiation of Investigation and prosecution of an unlawful act or an administrative sanction should be attributed to a person to ensure the implementation of the file according to the scope of the defendant’s plea may be based on a part of the case, and the act did not commit a crime in Article 74 of the Constitution are not to blame anyone and she knew that format. constitutional petition guaranteed by article …exercising the right to complain, the fact that his claim about the victim he is complaining about cannot be proven that the defendant has committed a libel crime cannot be considered proof that he has committed a libel crime, instead of an acquittal of a libel crime that has not occurred in connection with jihad, his conviction will be decided in writing,
Since the appeals of the defendant’s defense were considered in place as of this moment, the decision was therefore made in accordance with Section 8/1 of Law 5320. CMUK No. 1412, which must be implemented in accordance with its article.No. 321. its DETERIORATION in accordance with the article was decided unanimously on 19.02.2018.

You can read other articles and petition examples by clicking here.

Tags:
, , , , ,
No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran