worker Archives - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
254
archive,tag,tag-worker,tag-254,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

worker Tag

T.C. SUPREME 22.Legal Department Mainly: 2014/19136 Decision: 2014/23067 Decision Date: 08.09.2014 EMPLOYEE RECEIVABLES CASE – IN WHICH THE PLAINTIFF DEFAULTS TO THE EMPLOYER IN TERMS OF THE AFOREMENTIONED RECEIVABLES – OPERATION OF THE HIGHEST INTEREST APPLIED TO DEPOSITS BY BANKS FROM THE DATE OF DEFAULT ON OVERWORK AND GENERAL HOLIDAY Abstract:...

T.C. SUPREME 9. LEGAL DEPARTMENT E. 2016/33150 K. 2017/21641 T. 18.12.2017 * The employer uses his social and economic superiority to demand a written resignation from the worker under similar pressures to pay the compensation (if the worker complies with this, there can be no real will to resign/in this case...

T.O SUPREME 9. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2014/811 DECISION NO: 2015/14090 DECISION DATE: 14.04.2015 > IF WORK IS DONE OUTSIDE THE WORK OF THE WORKER, HE / SHE WILL KNOW THE WAGE FROM THE EMPLOYER. The plaintiff requested that the payment of unpaid wages and balance period wage receivables be decided. The...

T.C. SUPREME GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF LAW PRINCIPAL NO: 2015/22-1608 DECISION NO: 2018/448 DECISION DATE: 7.3.2018 >RETURN OF MILITARY SERVICE 18 ET AL. HE CANNOT FILE AN EXTRADITION SUIT BASED ON HIS PROVISIONS. Summary: 1.) Return of military service of the labor law 18 et al. he cannot file an extradition suit based...

T.O SUPREME 21. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2016/19742 DECISION NO: 2018/2740 DECISION DATE: 22.03.2018 Tribunal :Employment Tribunal >WORKER SERVICE IDENTIFICATION CASE, THE CASE FILE OF LABOR CLAIMS IN TERMS OF SERVICE IDENTIFICATION REQUEST IS STRONG EVIDENCE AND IS NOT CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE. The plaintiff requested that the work of the defendant's employer be determined...

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran