supreme court decision Archives - Page 4 of 4 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
247
archive,paged,tag,tag-supreme-court-decision,tag-247,paged-4,tag-paged-4,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

supreme court decision Tag

T.C. Supreme Court 22. Legal Department Principal No: 2018/6283 Decision No: 2018/10735 Decision Date: 04.05.2018 WORKERS ' CLAIMS CASE – COMPENSATION SUBJECT TO LAWSUIT AND TECHNICAL AND EXPERTISE OF CALCULATION OF RECEIVABLES NOT REQUIRED-ADVANCE FOR SUBSTITUTION OF EVIDENCE-CASE THE IMPROPRIETY OF THE BET AND REJECTION AS IT COULD NOT BE PROVED – WHERE...

Supreme Court 17. Legal Department 2016/15663 E. 2017/7899 K. Court :Court of First Instance At the end of the trial of the compensation case between the parties, the case was reviewed and considered necessary upon appeal by the plaintiff's attorney within the period of the decision given for the...

T.O SUPREME 21. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2016/19742 DECISION NO: 2018/2740 DECISION DATE: 22.03.2018 Tribunal :Employment Tribunal >WORKER SERVICE IDENTIFICATION CASE, THE CASE FILE OF LABOR CLAIMS IN TERMS OF SERVICE IDENTIFICATION REQUEST IS STRONG EVIDENCE AND IS NOT CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE. The plaintiff requested that the work of the defendant's employer be determined...

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran