supreme court decision Archives - Page 3 of 4 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE

Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.

alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz

247

archive,paged,tag,tag-supreme-court-decision,tag-247,paged-3,tag-paged-3,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive

supreme court decision Tag

07 Nov Supreme Court Decision About Slander Crime

Posted at 15:02h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. Supreme 8. Criminal Division Base No: 2018/7291 Decision No: 2018/10165 K. Date: 2.10.2018 Court : Criminal Court of First Instance Crime : libel Verdict: acquittal As necessary, discussed and considered: In order for the crime of libel to occur, it is necessary to attribute an illegal act to someone to ensure that an investigation...

07 Sep Supreme Court Ruling On Theft Charge

Posted at 20:12h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME 13.Criminal Division Basis: 2016/5725 Verdict: 2016/11037 Decision Date: 14.06.2016 CRIME OF THEFT-FAILURE TO APPLY WITHOUT REGARD TO THE FACT THAT TC 5237 IS IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS – WHERE THE PROVISION IS BROKEN Summary: 142/1-b, 143, 62 of TCK No. 5237. No. 765 with articles 493/1-final, 522, 59....

27 Aug Supreme Court Decision On Digitürk Subscription With False Identity

Posted at 21:17h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

Criminal General Assembly of the Supreme Court 2017/212 E. 2019/20 K. The Decision Maker Supreme Court Office: 11. Criminal Department Court: Sentencing Of First Instance Count: 476-821 Accused of forgery in private document ...

06 Jul Trafficking Crime

Posted at 16:41h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME 7. CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT E. 2014/15102 K. 2014/14597 T. 8.7.2014 Case: the decision given by The Local Court was appealed; the application's nature, type of punishment, duration and date of crime according to the file was read and considered after the requirement was discussed: Decision: the appeal of the...

06 Jul The Fault Of The Husband Who Inflicts Violence On His Wife

Posted at 15:48h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF LAW E. 2012/2-527 K. 2012/767 T. 7.11.2012 Case: at the end of the trial due to “Divorce, Financial, non-pecuniary compensation and nakaka” cases between the parties; Izmir 13. 01.10.2009 day and 2008/726 given by the Family Court regarding the partial acceptance of the alimony...

06 Jul Cancellation Of Negotiable Instruments

Posted at 15:31h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

SUPREME LEGAL DEPARTMENT 1979/1436 1979/1416 21.3.1979 Loss certificate due to loss of Negotiable Instruments (proof of the existence of receivables in the case filed without a bond ) Obligation to prove the existence of the receivables ( loss certificate due to loss of Negotiable Instruments ) Loss of bond (obligation to prove...

06 May The Decision Of The Supreme Court Regarding The Demand For Lien Within One Year

Posted at 02:23h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF LAW E. 2017/12-1147 K. 2017/1304 T. 8.11.2017 * Prompt cancellation of the civil servant process by way of complaint ( a creditor If a lien is requested within the annual period, the same period of one year Demand For Foreclosure In Which The Debtor's Property Has Not Been...

24 Apr Electricity Subscription Debt

Posted at 21:59h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. ISTANBUL DISTRICT COURTHOUSE COURT 3. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2017/1399 DECISION NO: 2018/878 DECISION DATE: 4.7.2018 > > MEN OF MUARAZA PROMPT–MUVAZAA–BURDEN OF PROOF–TO BE BOUND BY DEMAND 6100 / m.190,353 / 1-b-2 Summary: the case is related to muaraza's request for men. According to the expert report, it has been reported that the...

16 Apr Re-examination Of The Non-Follow-up Decision Of The Public Prosecutor’s Office.

Posted at 20:36h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME 18. CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2015/2372 DECISION NO: 2015/12784 DECISION DATE: 07.12.2015 > C. PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE LAW TO BREAK THE DECISION OF NON-FOLLOW-UP-INSULT AND THREAT-APPROVAL AUTHORITY Abstract: in the article of request; " Criminal Procedure Law No. 5271 No. 160. "as soon as the public...

14 Apr If The Female Worker Who Gives Birth Does Not Use The Milk Permit, She May Ask For An Increase In The Milk Permit Fee

Posted at 15:16h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. Supreme Court 22. Legal Department Principal No: 2015/16933 Decision No: 2017/19050 Decision Date: 25.09.2017 The Decision Of The Supreme Court Tribunal:Employment Tribunal CASE TYPE: RECEIVABLE Attorney of the plaintiff to review the decision made as a result of the case between the parties asked by, it was understood the appeal was pending....