supreme court decision Archives - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
247
archive,tag,tag-supreme-court-decision,tag-247,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
supreme court decision Tag
T.C.
Supreme Court
8. Criminal Department
Base No :2018/7291
Decision No :2018/10165
D. Date :2.10.2018
COURT : Criminal Court of First Instance
OFFENSE : Slander
VERDICT : Acquittal
It was discussed and considered as necessary:
In order for a libel crime to occur, it is necessary to attribute an illegal act to a person in...
T.C. SUPREME
20.Legal Department
Mainly: 2015/7834
Decision: 2016/7381
Decision Date: 22.06.2016
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES – CLAIM FOR DAMAGES CAUSED BY THE RETENTION OF THE LAND REGISTRY – RE-INVESTIGATION AND EVALUATION OF WHETHER REAL ESTATE CAN BE CONSIDERED IN THE LAND QUALITY – FAILURE TO ESTABLISH A PROVISION BASED ON INCOMPLETE...
T.C. SUPREME
14.Legal Department
Basis: 2015/14445
Decision: 2016/2648
Decision Date: 02.03.2016
REQUEST FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF INHERITANCE – THE PLAINTIFF IS ASKED AND DETERMINED ALL HIS EVIDENCE, INCLUDING THE WITNESS, TO PROVE THE CONNECTION BETWEEN MURISLE – INCOMPLETE EXAMINATION AND REJECTION OF THE CASE IS NOT A...
T.C. SUPREME
13.Legal Department
Principal: 2015/2853
Decision: 2016/7239
Decision Date: 08.03.2016
CLAIM OF RECEIVABLES-THE COURT MUST OBTAIN A REPORT FROM AN EXPERT, CONSIDERING THAT THE PLAINTIFF HAS BEEN UNFAIRLY DISMISSED – THE REFUSAL OF THE CASE IN TERMS OF THE ATTORNEY'S FEE RELATED TO THE FILE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORATE...
T.C. SUPREME
22.Legal Department
Basis: 2013/17991
Decision: 2014/28823
Decision Date: 23.10.2014
LABOR CLAIMS CASE – PLAINTIFF DID NOT RESIGN – PLAINTIFF SIGNED THE DOCUMENT MANDATORY TO RECEIVE AN UNEMPLOYMENT PENSION – PLAINTIFF'S EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT COULD NOT BE PROVED BY THE EMPLOYER THAT IT WAS TERMINATED FOR A JUSTIFIED REASON –...
T.C SUPREME COURT
6.Criminal Division
Basis: 2016 / 5144
Decision: 2017 / 411
Decision Date: 20.02.2017
Case and verdict: the verdict given by The Local Court was also appealed by the defendants ...
T.C SUPREME COURT
6.Criminal Division
Main: 2016/ 2213
Decision: 2018 / 7269
Decision Date: 27.11.2018
The sentence given by the Local Court was appealed; the file was discussed according to the nature of the application, type of punishment, duration and date of crime:
Other appeals have not been seen in place.
But;
1)...
T.C. SUPREME
17.Legal Department
Basis: 2014/10275
Decision: 2014/9522
Decision Date: 12.06.2014
A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES-IT IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THE RATES OF DEFECTS OF THE PARTIES IN THE ACCIDENT AND THE LOSS OF VALUE CAUSED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S VEHICLE – THE NEED TO OBTAIN A REPORT FAVORABLE TO A DETAILED...
T.C. SUPREME
19.Legal Department
Mainly: 2014/10262
Verdict: 2014/14317
Decision Date: 29.09.2014
CASE FOR CANCELLATION OF APPEAL-CREDIT CARD DEBT – THE NEED TO OBSERVE THAT THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE IS IN CHARGE WHEN THE DATE OF THE CASE IS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT
Abstract: considering the date of the case in a...
T.C. SUPREME
11.Legal Department
Mainly: 2014/6369
Decision: 2014/12272
Decision Date: 26.06.2014
CREDIT CASE – IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE LAPTOP WAS DAMAGED BY THE DEFENDANT'S DEFECT DURING THE TRANSPORT OF CARGO – THE LAPTOP PRICE WAS DECIDED TO BE COLLECTED FROM THE DEFENDANT ALONG WITH LEGAL INTEREST FROM THE DATE...