supreme court decision Archives - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
247
archive,tag,tag-supreme-court-decision,tag-247,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

supreme court decision Tag

T.C. SUPREME 20.Legal Department Mainly: 2015/7834 Decision: 2016/7381 Decision Date: 22.06.2016 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES – CLAIM FOR DAMAGES CAUSED BY THE RETENTION OF THE LAND REGISTRY – RE-INVESTIGATION AND EVALUATION OF WHETHER REAL ESTATE CAN BE CONSIDERED IN THE LAND QUALITY – FAILURE TO ESTABLISH A PROVISION BASED ON INCOMPLETE...

T.C. SUPREME 14.Legal Department Basis: 2015/14445 Decision: 2016/2648 Decision Date: 02.03.2016 REQUEST FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF INHERITANCE – THE PLAINTIFF IS ASKED AND DETERMINED ALL HIS EVIDENCE, INCLUDING THE WITNESS, TO PROVE THE CONNECTION BETWEEN MURISLE – INCOMPLETE EXAMINATION AND REJECTION OF THE CASE IS NOT A...

T.C. SUPREME 13.Legal Department Principal: 2015/2853 Decision: 2016/7239 Decision Date: 08.03.2016 CLAIM OF RECEIVABLES-THE COURT MUST OBTAIN A REPORT FROM AN EXPERT, CONSIDERING THAT THE PLAINTIFF HAS BEEN UNFAIRLY DISMISSED – THE REFUSAL OF THE CASE IN TERMS OF THE ATTORNEY'S FEE RELATED TO THE FILE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORATE...

T.C. SUPREME 17.Legal Department Basis: 2014/10275 Decision: 2014/9522 Decision Date: 12.06.2014 A CLAIM FOR DAMAGES-IT IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THE RATES OF DEFECTS OF THE PARTIES IN THE ACCIDENT AND THE LOSS OF VALUE CAUSED BY THE PLAINTIFF'S VEHICLE – THE NEED TO OBTAIN A REPORT FAVORABLE TO A DETAILED...

T.C. SUPREME 11.Legal Department Mainly: 2014/6369 Decision: 2014/12272 Decision Date: 26.06.2014 CREDIT CASE – IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE LAPTOP WAS DAMAGED BY THE DEFENDANT'S DEFECT DURING THE TRANSPORT OF CARGO – THE LAPTOP PRICE WAS DECIDED TO BE COLLECTED FROM THE DEFENDANT ALONG WITH LEGAL INTEREST FROM THE DATE...

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran