mamhutlar Archives - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
1231
archive,tag,tag-mamhutlar,tag-1231,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
T.C
SUPREME
2. law office
BASE NO:2016/16526
DECISION NO:2018/5328
DATE OF DECISION:19.04.2018
COURT :Family Court
TYPE OF CASE :Mutual Divorce
>A MUTUAL DIVORCE CASE IS A PARTNER WHO SAYS THAT HE DOES NOT WANT HIS PARTNER IN HIS PRIVATE LIFE AND DOES NOT WANT TO BE TOGETHER SEXUALLY IS SEVERELY FLAWED
ABSTRACT: Although the...
A pending is a previously filed and ongoing case of the same case, and this is now specified as a condition of the case in HMK. The same case is used to refer to cases where the parties, cause and subject matter are the same.
A...
T.C.
THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
3. Law Department
The Decision of 2015/4561 is Based on 2016/2442 Dated 23.2.2016
LAWSUIT: As a result of the court's hearing of the compensation case between the parties, the decision to accept the case was appealed by the defendants within the time...
Posted at 01:08h
in
petition
by Yağız Canseven
Article 1- This agreement is in question...
The principle of introduction by the parties
Except for the exceptions provided for in the law, the judge cannot spontaneously take into account what or what cases one of the two parties has not said, and cannot even engage in behavior that may remind them.
The judge...
Posted at 13:43h
in
petition
by Yağız Canseven
TO THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
File No : 2015/...
T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
General Assembly of Law
Base: 1981/551
Decision: 1981/683
Date of Decision: 21.10.1981
DIVORCE CASE – WAIVER OF THE CASE - NO DECISION CORRECTION REVIEW CAN BE MADE ON THE CASE THAT HAS DISAPPEARED
SUMMARY: Since the plaintiff has waived his case, the case, which...