lawyer Archives - Page 219 of 223 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE

Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.

alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz

218

archive,paged,tag,tag-lawyer,tag-218,paged-219,tag-paged-219,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive

lawyer Tag

09 Apr The Duration Of The Appeal To Coincide With The Judicial Holiday

Posted at 15:10h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

The Supreme Court 15. Legal Department 2018/2122 E. 2018/1173 K. The court of First Instance for the case between plaintiffs 1-...

09 Apr Objection To Signature

Posted at 15:02h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME 19. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2016/11600 DECISION NO: 2018/441 DECISION DATE: 7.2.2018 >SIGNATURE OBJECTION-THE NEED FOR SIGNATURE SAMPLES TO BE TAKEN BEFORE THE PARTIES AT THE HEARING–SIGNATURE SAMPLES TO BE MADE AFTER THE HEARING BY DECISIONREFERENCES 2004 / m.72 Summary Dec Dec.1 after hearing in the court dated 23.01.2014 with the...

09 Apr Supplementary Welfare Allowance Is Not Given To The Woman Who Is Working And Has Income

Posted at 14:57h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.O SUPREME 2. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2016/16665 DECISION NO: 2018/5562 DECISION DATE: 25.04.2018 Court: Family Court Case type: divorce THE WOMAN WHO IS WORKING AND HAS A PERMANENT INCOME IS NOT ENTITLED TO ALIMONY. At the end of the judgment of the case between the parties given by the Local Court, the verdict...

09 Apr Alimony, Removal Of Temporary Alimony

Posted at 14:51h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.O SUPREME 2. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2016/16661 DECISION NO: 2018/5566 DECISION DATE: 25.04.2018 Court: Family Court Type of case : divorce-abolition of injunction alimony > > THE REMOVAL OF THE MEASURE ALIMONY IS NOT AN OCT OF THE DIVORCE AND IS SUBJECT TO RELATIVE FEES. JOINT OPERATIONS CAN NOT BE DONE WITHOUT...

09 Apr Missing The Time Of Appeal

Posted at 14:44h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

Supreme Court 12. Legal Department PRINCIPAL NO: 2018/47 DECISION NO: 2018/6880 The file related to this work was sent to the office upon the request of the plaintiffs for the appeal examination within the period of the decision made by the District Court Court with the date and...

09 Apr Terms For Removing Content From The Internet

Posted at 14:34h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

Internet Content (Video, Photos, News, comments, etc.) What are the requirements for removal and blocking access? Pictures, videos, news, comments posted on the internet, etc. Article 8 of Law No. 5651. and 9. the removal of content posted on the internet web Site or the blocking of...

09 Apr How to Remove Content Due To Violation Of Personality Rights?

Posted at 14:30h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

9/1 Of Law No. 5651.according to the article, video, pictures, News, comments, etc. if the content is posted on the internet, the person whose right of personality is violated may request that the content be removed or that access be blocked. Every attack on the rights...

09 Apr How Can Content and Publication Be Removed In Case Of Violation Of Personality Rights Without Recourse To Court ?

Posted at 14:23h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

To the victim content provider whose rights have been violated (news or commenters, videos or forgeries, etc.) in the event that the person who uploads the images cannot access it, he or she may contact the location provider (the company that provides hosting services to...

09 Apr Decision To Block Access- Supreme Court Ruling For Fake Twitter and Face

Posted at 14:16h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

7.Criminal Division 2014/5036 E. , 2014/12937 K. In order to remove the user name and profile picture of the twitter account created with the username @ertemsener on the social networking site called Twitter and the contents of the spoofed tweet on this account.. P.. Büyükçekmece 1....

09 Apr Example Of Supreme Court Ruling That Constitutes An Attack On The Rights Of Persons Over The Internet

Posted at 14:08h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME 4. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO. 2013/7417 DECISION NO. 2013/10004 DECISION DATE. 27.5.2013 Request for moral compensation and injunctions (based on assault on Personal Rights on the website – the requirement that the Magistrates ' Court is in charge) Assault on personal rights on the website (request for Moral compensation and...