lawyer Archives - Page 215 of 223 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE

Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.

alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz

218

archive,paged,tag,tag-lawyer,tag-218,paged-215,tag-paged-215,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive

lawyer Tag

18 Apr The Real Estate Which Is Not Determined To Be Owned By The Spouses Is Deemed To Be Their Share Property

Posted at 00:34h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. Supreme 8. Legal Department Principal No: 2014/14603 Decision No: 2015/21591 Decision Date: 2.12.2015 N.. B.. with M.. He.. the court of First Instance of Karamürsel for the rejection of the claim arising from the property regime between them 14.02.2014 days and ...

18 Apr Ignoring The Work Of The Worker Before Being Staffed

Posted at 00:28h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF LAW PRINCIPAL NO: 2018/7-179 DECISION NO: 2018/683 DECISION DATE: 4.4.2018 > > THERE IS NO LEGAL BASIS FOR CREATING A QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE WORK BEFORE EMPLOYMENT AND THE WORK AFTER EMPLOYMENT, OR FOR TAKING ACTION AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF BY IGNORING THE WORK BEFORE EMPLOYMENT– THE...

16 Apr Sale Of The Company’s Real Estate At a Lower Price

Posted at 21:08h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. Supreme 11. Legal Department Principal No: 2014/12697 Decision No: 2015/10020 Decision Date: 6.10.2015 Malatya 4. Examination of the decision no. 2012/483-2013/323 of 12/09/2013 issued by the court of first instance by the Court of Cassation. S.. with S.. P.. after hearing the report prepared by the examination Judge for the...

16 Apr Inflation Differential-Supreme Court Decision

Posted at 21:04h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. Council 4. Department Principal No: 2013/1150 Decision No: 2013/9562 Decision Date: 9.12.2013 Summary: it is necessary to acknowledge that the amount reached when the base is calculated on the basis of the sector's profitability ratio in construction and contracting works reflects the taxable income of the enterprise and that all...

16 Apr Floor Ownership Is The Employer Of The Workers Who Work In The Workplace Subject To The Law

Posted at 20:59h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME 9. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2017/5716 DECISION NO: 2017/14596 DECISION DATE: 2.10.2017 Summary: the employer of the worker who works in places subject to floor ownership is the floor owners and the floor owners are equally responsible for the labor receivables. The management is the employer representative. Although the...

16 Apr The Decision Of The State Council That The Consumer Bank Will Not Receive An Account Transaction Fee

Posted at 20:53h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

Council of state 15. APARTMENT Basis: 2014/9570 Verdict: 2018/1194 Plaintiff : Consumer Issues Association Deputy: … Defendant: Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency Deputy: … Summary of the case: Regulation on procedures and principles regarding fees to be received from financial consumers, which was published in the Official Gazette dated 03.10.2014 and numbered...

16 Apr Negative Detection Case Based On Collateral Claim

Posted at 20:46h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME 19. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2016/3357 DECISION NO: 2016/13899 DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016 > > EXCHANGE FOLLOW-UP, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE DEED IS A GUARANTEE, BURDEN OF PROOF AND EVIDENCE STATUS 6100 / m.222/5 6102 / m.64 Summary: the case is related to the negative determination prompt. The plaintiff,...

16 Apr Re-examination Of The Non-Follow-up Decision Of The Public Prosecutor’s Office.

Posted at 20:36h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME 18. CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2015/2372 DECISION NO: 2015/12784 DECISION DATE: 07.12.2015 > C. PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE LAW TO BREAK THE DECISION OF NON-FOLLOW-UP-INSULT AND THREAT-APPROVAL AUTHORITY Abstract: in the article of request; " Criminal Procedure Law No. 5271 No. 160. "as soon as the public...

15 Apr Occupation Of Treasure Land

Posted at 16:21h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C SUPREME COURT 16.Legal Department Basis: 2016/ 16646 Decision: 2020 / 234 Decision Date: 10.02.22020 THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT COURT :COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE The court of Cassation asked to review the decision given as a result of the case between the parties; it was understood...

15 Apr Effects Of Cessation Of Execution And Bankruptcy Proceedings

Posted at 16:16h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

STOPPING EXECUTION WITHIN THE SCOPE OF NOTIFICATIONS RECEIVED ABOUT CORONA VIRUS Verdict Corona virus, which is closely followed by the whole world because of a global epidemic, is rapidly it continues to spread, and as much as it affects social life, it also harms business and business life. gives....