law Archives - Page 84 of 221 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE

Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.

alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz

220

archive,paged,tag,tag-law,tag-220,paged-84,tag-paged-84,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive

law Tag

02 Nov DURATION OF OPENING OF THE RECOVERY CASE

Posted at 21:19h in INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

The Duration of the Recovery Case According to article 99 of the law, the creditor must file a ration claim within seven days. I- The seven-day trial filing period begins not from the "date when the creditor finds out about the foreclosure", but from the "date when...

02 Nov RECOVERY SUIT AT LAW OF INHERITANCE

Posted at 21:16h in INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

In inheritance law, we can state about the ration case based on the articles of the Law; “After the death of the person who left the inheritance, the heirs will have all kinds of property and all kinds of rights available in the estate”. In...

02 Nov WHO ARE THE PARTIES OF RECOVERY SUITS

Posted at 21:10h in INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

WHO ARE THE PARTIES OFTHE RECOVERY SUITS? If the property is in the hands of the debtor at the time of foreclosure, the right to file a lawsuit belongs to the third party. The third person who can file a lawsuit here is the person who...

02 Nov RECOVERY SUIT

Posted at 21:08h in petition by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORATE FILE NO : 2015/...

02 Nov EXAMPLE PETITION OF A RECOVERY CHALLENGE

Posted at 21:05h in petition by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORATE FILE NO: ...

02 Nov APPEAL PETITION FOR RECOVERY CHALLENGE OF A THIRD PARTY

Posted at 21:03h in petition by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

APPEAL PETITION FOR RECOVERY CHALLENGE OF A THIRD PARTY …………….TO THE EXECUTIVE CIVIL COURT PLAINTIFF :……. DEPUTIES :...

29 Oct IN A CLEAR AND INCOMPREHENSIBLE STATEMENT, BASED ON THE AMOUNTS SPECIFIED FROM EACH DEFENDANT’S POINT OF VIEW, IT IS INCORRECT TO ESTABLISH A PROVISION IN THE FORM OF JOINT RECEIPT FROM THE DEFENDANTS AND DELIVERY TO THE PLAINTIFF

Posted at 14:37h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

11.law office Base: 2016/4219 Decision: 2016/6890 Date of Decision: 22.06.2016 A REQUEST TO COLLECT CORPORATE DAMAGES – IN THE FORM OF A REQUEST TO BE RECEIVED JOINTLY FROM THE DEFENDANTS BASED ON THE AMOUNTS SPECIFIED IN EACH DEFENDANT AND GIVEN TO THE PLAINTIFF IN A CLEAR AND INCOMPREHENSIBLE WAY,...

29 Oct IN ORDER FOR AN APPEAL REVIEW TO BE CONDUCTED, THE VALUE OF THE GOODS OR RIGHTS THAT THE DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COURT JUL WILL NOT EXCEED THE SPECIFIED AMOUNT – THE VALUE OF THE OFFENDING GOODS REMAINS BELOW THE APPEAL LIMIT

Posted at 14:35h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME COURT 8.law office Base: 2016/10162 Decision: 2016/10473 Date of Decision: 14.06.2016 THE CASE ARISING FROM FORECLOSURE – THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OR RIGHT THAT THE DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COURT JUL WILL NOT EXCEED THE SPECIFIED AMOUNT IN ORDER TO CONDUCT AN APPEAL REVIEW – THE VALUE...

29 Oct THE VALUE OF THE ATTATCHED PROPERTIES’ ARE BELOW THE LEGAL LIMIT

Posted at 14:33h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME COURT 8.law office Base: 2016/9792 Decision: 2016/10477 Date of Decision: 14.06.2016 THE CASE OF THE RATION - WHERE THE VALUE OF THE VICTIMS SUBJECT TO APPEAL IS BELOW THE LEGAL LIMIT – REJECTION OF THE APPEAL PETITION ABSTRACT: In the concrete case, the value of the victims who are...

29 Oct IN ORDER FOR THE FOLLOW-UP OF RECOVERY CASES TO BE CARRIED OUT IN ORDER FOR THE APPEAL REVIEW TO BE MADE IN THE ABETEMENT DECISIONS, THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OR THE RIGHT THAT THE DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COURT CARRIES OUT MUST EXCEED THE SPECIFIED AMOUNT

Posted at 14:29h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME COURT 8.law office Base: 2016/9690 Decision: 2016/10437 Date of Decision: 14.06.2016 FORTIFICATION CASE – THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OR RIGHT HELD BY THE DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COURT EXCEEDS THE ESTABLISHED AMOUNT IN ORDER FOR THE FOLLOW–UP OF FORTIFICATION CASES TO BE REVIEWED ON...