law Archives - Page 218 of 221 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE

Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.

alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz

220

archive,paged,tag,tag-law,tag-220,paged-218,tag-paged-218,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive

law Tag

10 Apr Family Residence Permit

Posted at 15:55h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

Family Residence Permit In Turkey Family residence permits are issued in Articles 34 to 37 of the foreigners and International Protection Law No. 6458. In addition, family residence permits are regulated in articles 30 to 34 of the regulation on the application of the foreigners and...

10 Apr Vat Is Included In The Sale Price Unless Stated To Be Paid Separately In The Sale Of The Real Estate

Posted at 15:47h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. Supreme Principal No: 2014/19132 Decision No: 2015/6993 K. Date: 12.5.2015 At the end of the trial of the case for the cancellation of the appeal between the parties, the file was examined and considered upon appeal by the deputies of the party within the period of the sentence given...

10 Apr If Someone Other Than The Owner Is Driving When The Disabled’s Car Crashes, He / She Cannot Benefit From Insurance

Posted at 15:32h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

Supreme Court 17. Legal Department 2016/15663 E. 2017/7899 K. Court :Court of First Instance At the end of the trial of the compensation case between the parties, the case was reviewed and considered necessary upon appeal by the plaintiff's attorney within the period of the decision given for the...

10 Apr Divorce, It’s a Big Flaw To Say He Doesn’t Want His Wife In His Private Life.

Posted at 15:23h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.O SUPREME 2. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2016/16526 DECISION NO: 2018/5328 DECISION DATE: 19.04.2018 Court: Family Court Case type: mutual divorce > MUTUAL DIVORCE, THE WIFE WHO SAYS THAT SHE DOES NOT WANT TO BE WITH HER IN PRIVATE LIFE AND DOES NOT WANT TO BE WITH THE SEXUAL SENSE IS SERIOUSLY FLAWED Summary:...

10 Apr The Worker Service Determination Case Is Strong Evidence And Not a Definitive Evidence

Posted at 15:17h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.O SUPREME 21. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2016/19742 DECISION NO: 2018/2740 DECISION DATE: 22.03.2018 Tribunal :Employment Tribunal >WORKER SERVICE IDENTIFICATION CASE, THE CASE FILE OF LABOR CLAIMS IN TERMS OF SERVICE IDENTIFICATION REQUEST IS STRONG EVIDENCE AND IS NOT CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE. The plaintiff requested that the work of the defendant's employer be determined...

09 Apr The Duration Of The Appeal To Coincide With The Judicial Holiday

Posted at 15:10h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

The Supreme Court 15. Legal Department 2018/2122 E. 2018/1173 K. The court of First Instance for the case between plaintiffs 1-...

09 Apr Objection To Signature

Posted at 15:02h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME 19. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2016/11600 DECISION NO: 2018/441 DECISION DATE: 7.2.2018 >SIGNATURE OBJECTION-THE NEED FOR SIGNATURE SAMPLES TO BE TAKEN BEFORE THE PARTIES AT THE HEARING–SIGNATURE SAMPLES TO BE MADE AFTER THE HEARING BY DECISIONREFERENCES 2004 / m.72 Summary Dec Dec.1 after hearing in the court dated 23.01.2014 with the...

09 Apr Supplementary Welfare Allowance Is Not Given To The Woman Who Is Working And Has Income

Posted at 14:57h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.O SUPREME 2. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2016/16665 DECISION NO: 2018/5562 DECISION DATE: 25.04.2018 Court: Family Court Case type: divorce THE WOMAN WHO IS WORKING AND HAS A PERMANENT INCOME IS NOT ENTITLED TO ALIMONY. At the end of the judgment of the case between the parties given by the Local Court, the verdict...

09 Apr Alimony, Removal Of Temporary Alimony

Posted at 14:51h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.O SUPREME 2. LEGAL DEPARTMENT PRINCIPAL NO: 2016/16661 DECISION NO: 2018/5566 DECISION DATE: 25.04.2018 Court: Family Court Type of case : divorce-abolition of injunction alimony > > THE REMOVAL OF THE MEASURE ALIMONY IS NOT AN OCT OF THE DIVORCE AND IS SUBJECT TO RELATIVE FEES. JOINT OPERATIONS CAN NOT BE DONE WITHOUT...

09 Apr Missing The Time Of Appeal

Posted at 14:44h in General by Aşıkoğlu Law Office 0 Comments

0 Likes

Supreme Court 12. Legal Department PRINCIPAL NO: 2018/47 DECISION NO: 2018/6880 The file related to this work was sent to the office upon the request of the plaintiffs for the appeal examination within the period of the decision made by the District Court Court with the date and...

law Tag

10 Apr Family Residence Permit

10 Apr Vat Is Included In The Sale Price Unless Stated To Be Paid Separately In The Sale Of The Real Estate

10 Apr If Someone Other Than The Owner Is Driving When The Disabled’s Car Crashes, He / She Cannot Benefit From Insurance

10 Apr Divorce, It’s a Big Flaw To Say He Doesn’t Want His Wife In His Private Life.

10 Apr The Worker Service Determination Case Is Strong Evidence And Not a Definitive Evidence

09 Apr The Duration Of The Appeal To Coincide With The Judicial Holiday

09 Apr Objection To Signature

09 Apr Supplementary Welfare Allowance Is Not Given To The Woman Who Is Working And Has Income

09 Apr Alimony, Removal Of Temporary Alimony

09 Apr Missing The Time Of Appeal

Address

Phone

E-Mail