law Archives - Page 139 of 221 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
220
archive,paged,tag,tag-law,tag-220,paged-139,tag-paged-139,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
Supreme Court of the Republic of Turkey 16.Legal Department Basic Number: 2016/16646 Decision: 2020/234 Decision Date: 10.02.2020
SUPREME COURT DECISION
COURT :COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
As a result of the case between the parties, the decision given by the Supreme Court was requested to be examined; it was...
T.C SUPREME COURT 20.Legal Department Basis: 2017 / 8118 Decision: 2020 / 630 Decision Date: 11.02.2020
SUPREME COURT DECISION
Court :Cadastral Court
At the end of the hearing of the case between the parties, the decision of the Supreme Court to review the provision established by the plaintiff...
T.C SUPREME COURT 16.Legal Department Basis: 2016 / 14588 Decision: 2020 / 488 Decision Date: 17.02.2020
SUPREME COURT DECISION
COURT :COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
As a result of the case between the parties, the decision given by the Supreme Court was requested to be examined; it was understood...
T.C SUPREME COURT 16.Legal Department Basis: 2016/15334 Decision: 2020/1492 Decision Date: 17.02.2020
SUPREME COURT DECISION
COURT :COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
As a result of the case between the parties, the decision given by the Supreme Court was requested to be examined; it was understood that the appeal request...
T.C SUPREME COURT 20.Legal Department Basis: 2019 / 4916 Decision: 2020 / 823 Decision Date: 18.02.2020
SUPREME COURT DECISION
Court :Cadastral Court
At the end of the trial of the case between the parties, the decision established by the Supreme Court was examined at a hearing by the...
17. Law Department 17. Legal Department
BASIS NO: 2017/1035 DECISION NO: 2019/9243
Attorney of the plaintiff, 23/10/2011 and 10/11/2011 Ercis earthquakes occurred on the house belonging to his client was severely damaged, the decision was made by the competent authorities to destroy this house on 27/12/2010 Ergo...
…….YOUR HONOR
…….
Plaintiff:...
…….YOUR HONOR
INJUNCTION IS REQUIRED
…….
Plaintiff:...
……………. Court President
FILE NO.:...
……………. FAMILY COURT JUDGE
REQUESTING INJUNCTION:
Identity no of the Turkic Republic :
Deputy (if any):
ABOUT MEASURE
REQUESTED :
Deputy (if any) :
Subject: about our request for measures in accordance with law 6284
Comments: about my wife, who requested an injunction...