T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 19.law office Base: 2016/537 Decision: 2016/10689 Date of Decision: 14.06.2016 CASE OF REPLACEMENT OF DEFECTIVE GOODS – THE EXPERT REPORT ON THE DEDUCTION OF THE PRICE IS NOT BASED ON ADEQUATE EXAMINATION AND IS NOT SUITABLE FOR AUDIT – THE INADEQUACY OF THE...
Electoral rights are innovative rights that the consumer has to prevent victimization in the face of defective goods or services. Material conditions related to the current month have been realized in the goods it has purchased, and the consumer who has fulfilled the necessary form requirements...
... Prefect (Chairman Of The District Arbitration Committee On Consumer Issues) COMPLAINANT : Deputy : COMPLAINED : Subject of complaint: we respond to the application against us with the request for payment of the cost of defective goods. MONETARY COMPLAINT VALUE: ... TL. INSTRUCTIONS : 1 -) the complainant and our client agreed to...
... TO THE JUDGE OF THE COURT PLAINTIFF : ADDRESS : Acting : ADDRESS : DEFENDANT : ADDRESS : Subject: the collection of the damage suffered due to the defective product consists of our request. INSTRUCTIONS 1 -) Our client, .... within the boundaries of and .... located in the area around .... the...
