antalya Archives - Page 85 of 222 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
223
archive,paged,tag,tag-antalya,tag-223,paged-85,tag-paged-85,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

antalya Tag

T.C. SUPREME COURT 8.law office Base: 2016/9690 Decision: 2016/10437 Date of Decision: 14.06.2016 FORTIFICATION CASE – THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OR RIGHT HELD BY THE DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COURT EXCEEDS THE ESTABLISHED AMOUNT IN ORDER FOR THE FOLLOW–UP OF FORTIFICATION CASES TO BE REVIEWED ON...

T.C. SUPREME COURT 4.law office Base: 2016/3774 Decision: 2016/7793 Date of Decision: 13.06.2016 COMPENSATION CASE – IT IS NECESSARY TO DETERMINE THE START DATE OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS AS OF THE DATE OF THE PLAINTIFF'S LOSS – THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS HAS EXPIRED – IT IS NECESSARY TO DECIDE...

T.C. SUPREME COURT 8.law office Base : 2014/21867 Decision: 2016/10043 Date of Decision: 08.06.2016 FORTIFICATION CASE – WHERE THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY OR RIGHT CARRIED OUT BY THE DECISION OF THE EXECUTIVE COURT IS REQUIRED TO EXCEED THE SPECIFIED AMOUNT – APPROVAL OF THE PROVISION ABSTRACT: In order to conduct...

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran