antalya Archives - Page 37 of 222 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE

Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.

alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz

223

archive,paged,tag,tag-antalya,tag-223,paged-37,tag-paged-37,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive

antalya Tag

05 Mar RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HEAD OF THE FAMILY-THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT

Posted at 15:20h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 3. Law Department 2011/3430 base 2011/6636 Decision 18.4.2011 Dated In the lawsuit petition, it was requested that 2500 liras of compensation be collected from the defendant side along with interest and expenses. The court dismissed the case and the verdict was appealed...

05 Mar COMPENSATION BASED ON THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ANIMAL OWNER-SUPREME COURT DECISION

Posted at 15:18h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 3. Law Department The Decision of 2015/4561 is Based on 2016/2442 Dated 23.2.2016 LAWSUIT: As a result of the court's hearing of the compensation case between the parties, the decision to accept the case was appealed by the defendants within the time...

05 Mar AN EXAMPLE OF A WARNING FOR AN APPLICATION FILED AGAINST US WITH A REQUEST TO PAY THE PRICE OF DEFECTIVE GOODS

Posted at 15:16h in petition by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

TO THE GOVERNOR'S OFFICE (Chairmanship of the District Arbitration Committee on Consumer Issues) THE COMPLAINANT : attorney : RESPONDENT : SUBJECT OF THE COMPLAINT: Our Answers to the Application Made Against Us with the Request to Pay the Price of Defective Goods. YOUR COMPLAINT IS MONETARY VALUE : ...

05 Mar A WARNING ABOUT THE VEHICLE IS DAMAGED AND THE PAYMENT OF THE GAP

Posted at 15:07h in petition by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

TO THE ...

05 Mar AN EXAMPLE OF A PETITION FOR COMPENSATION

Posted at 15:04h in petition by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

TO THE ...

05 Mar THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE FACT THAT THE LAPTOP WAS DAMAGED BY THE DEFENDANT’S DEFECT DURING CARGO TRANSPORTATION

Posted at 15:01h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 11.law office Base: 2014/6369 Decision: 2014/12272 Date of Decision: 26.06.2014 CASE OF RECEIVABLES – IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE LAPTOP WAS DAMAGED BY THE DEFENDANT'S FAULT DURING CARGO TRANSPORTATION – IT IS DECIDED TO COLLECT THE COST OF THE LAPTOP FROM THE DEFENDANT...

05 Mar WHAT IS THE RIGHT OF WITHDRAWAL?

Posted at 14:59h in INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

ARTICLE 18 - (1) The consumer has the right to withdraw from the sales contract in installments without any justification and without paying criminal penalties within seven days. (2) It is sufficient that the notification about the exercise of the right of withdrawal has been sent...

05 Mar CASE OF CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL – CREDIT CARD DEBT

Posted at 14:57h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 19.law office Base: 2014/10262 Decision: 2014/14317 Date of Decision: 29.09.2014 CASE OF CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL - CREDIT CARD DEBT - THE NEED TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THAT THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE IS IN CHARGE WHEN CONSIDERING THE DATE OF THE CASE ABSTRACT:...

05 Mar STUDENT REGISTRATION AGREEMENT

Posted at 01:08h in petition by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

Article 1- This agreement is in question...

05 Mar THE COURT IN CHARGE OF BANK CREDIT CARD DISPUTES – WHERE THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE IS IN CHARGE AS OF THE DATE OF THE CASE – IS MISTAKEN IN THE INTERPRETATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE DUTY AND THE DECISION THAT THE PROVISION IS INVALID

Posted at 01:06h in General, INFORMATION by Yağız Canseven 0 Comments

0 Likes

T.C. THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT 19.law office Base: 2015/11083 Decision: 2016/4043 Date of Decision: 07.03.2016 RECEIVABLES CASE – THE COURT IN CHARGE OF BANK CREDIT CARD DISPUTES – THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE IS IN CHARGE AS OF THE DATE OF THE CASE – THE INTERPRETATION OF THE...

antalya Tag

05 Mar RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HEAD OF THE FAMILY-THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT

05 Mar COMPENSATION BASED ON THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ANIMAL OWNER-SUPREME COURT DECISION

05 Mar AN EXAMPLE OF A WARNING FOR AN APPLICATION FILED AGAINST US WITH A REQUEST TO PAY THE PRICE OF DEFECTIVE GOODS

05 Mar A WARNING ABOUT THE VEHICLE IS DAMAGED AND THE PAYMENT OF THE GAP

05 Mar AN EXAMPLE OF A PETITION FOR COMPENSATION

05 Mar THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT ON THE FACT THAT THE LAPTOP WAS DAMAGED BY THE DEFENDANT’S DEFECT DURING CARGO TRANSPORTATION

05 Mar WHAT IS THE RIGHT OF WITHDRAWAL?

05 Mar CASE OF CANCELLATION OF THE APPEAL – CREDIT CARD DEBT

05 Mar STUDENT REGISTRATION AGREEMENT

05 Mar THE COURT IN CHARGE OF BANK CREDIT CARD DISPUTES – WHERE THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE IS IN CHARGE AS OF THE DATE OF THE CASE – IS MISTAKEN IN THE INTERPRETATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THE DUTY AND THE DECISION THAT THE PROVISION IS INVALID

Address

Phone

E-Mail