antalya Archives - Page 216 of 222 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
223
archive,paged,tag,tag-antalya,tag-223,paged-216,tag-paged-216,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
Decision Making And Implementation Of Precautionary Measures
It is possible for the decision of the injunction to be taken and implemented within the period during which the execution is halted. Because
There was no regulation on this issue in the resolution. So far, according to material law
holidays...
T.C. Supreme Court 22. Legal Department
Principal No: 2015/16933
Decision No: 2017/19050
Decision Date: 25.09.2017
The Decision Of The Supreme Court
Tribunal:Employment Tribunal
CASE TYPE: RECEIVABLE
Attorney of the plaintiff to review the decision made as a result of the case between the parties
asked by, it was understood the appeal was pending....
T.C. Supreme Court 22. Legal Department Principal
No: 2018/6283
Decision No: 2018/10735
Decision Date: 04.05.2018
WORKERS ' CLAIMS CASE – COMPENSATION SUBJECT TO LAWSUIT AND
TECHNICAL AND EXPERTISE OF CALCULATION OF RECEIVABLES
NOT REQUIRED-ADVANCE FOR SUBSTITUTION OF EVIDENCE-CASE
THE IMPROPRIETY OF THE BET AND REJECTION AS IT COULD NOT BE PROVED –
WHERE...
T.C. SUPREME
13. Legal Department
Principal No: 2014/19529
Decision No: 2014/20906
Decision Date: 24.06.2014
SUPREME COURT DECISION
Court: Şereflikoçhisar 1. The Court Of First Instance
Date: 29/01/2013
Number: 2011/180-2013/76
At the end of the trial of the receivables case between the parties, for reasons written in the decree
the defendants within the term of the...
... TO THE HEAD OF THE HIGH CRIMINAL COURT;
DEFENDANT :
Defense :
DECISION DATE AND NOSU :
Subject: our objections to the refusal of our request to renew the trial.
INSTRUCTIONS :
1 -) My client was sentenced to a year's imprisonment for his crime ... by the decision of...
... TO THE HEAD OF THE HIGH CRIMINAL COURT;
DEFENDANT :
Defense :
DECISION DATE AND NO :
Subject: our request for a retrial.
INSTRUCTIONS :
1 -) My client was sentenced to a year's imprisonment for his crime ... by the decision of your court set out above date and...
... TO THE MAGISTRATES ' COURT,
Query File No. : …/…
SUSPECTED :
Defense :
ARREST DATE :
Subject: 5271 S. K. m. 108/2 in accordance with the state of detention
it is our request to review.
INSTRUCTIONS :
1 -) our client is suspicious, .../.../..... he was arrested in accordance with the...
... TO THE HEAD OF THE HIGH CRIMINAL COURT
File NO: ... / ... E.
DEFENDANT :
Defense :
Subject: ...our appeal against the decision of the High Criminal Court .../.../ ... to continue the day-to-day detention.
INSTRUCTIONS :
1 -) it is decided that our client should be arrested at...
T.C.
SUPREME
8. LEGAL DEPARTMENT
E. 2015/15599
K. 2018/332
T. 15.1.2018
At the end of the proceedings between the parties and in the case described above
The court has decided to dismiss the case and the verdict will be appealed by the plaintiff
on it, the dossier was examined by the Department, considered...
T.C. Supreme Court 20. Legal Department
Principal No: 2017/9857 Decision No: 2017/9650 Decision Date: 20.11.2017
CASE FOR OBJECTION TO THE DISCRETION OF THE ASSET – THE GOODS BY INSTRUCTION
LOCATION RELATED TO THE FORECLOSURE MADE BY THE ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE
THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE IS CONNECTED TO THE FORECLOSURE IN THE...