antalya Archives - Page 215 of 222 - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
223
archive,paged,tag,tag-antalya,tag-223,paged-215,tag-paged-215,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
T.C.
Council
4. Department
Principal No: 2013/1150
Decision No: 2013/9562
Decision Date: 9.12.2013
Summary: it is necessary to acknowledge that the amount reached when the base is calculated on the basis of the sector's profitability ratio in construction and contracting works reflects the taxable income of the enterprise and that all...
T.C.
SUPREME
9. LEGAL DEPARTMENT
PRINCIPAL NO: 2017/5716
DECISION NO: 2017/14596
DECISION DATE: 2.10.2017
Summary: the employer of the worker who works in places subject to floor ownership is the floor owners and the floor owners are equally responsible for the labor receivables. The management is the employer representative. Although the...
Council of state 15. APARTMENT
Basis: 2014/9570
Verdict: 2018/1194
Plaintiff : Consumer Issues Association
Deputy: …
Defendant: Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency
Deputy: …
Summary of the case: Regulation on procedures and principles regarding fees to be received from financial consumers, which was published in the Official Gazette dated 03.10.2014 and numbered...
T.C.
SUPREME
19. LEGAL DEPARTMENT
PRINCIPAL NO: 2016/3357
DECISION NO: 2016/13899
DECISION DATE: 24.10.2016
> > EXCHANGE FOLLOW-UP, NEGATIVE DETECTION CASE BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT THE DEED IS A GUARANTEE, BURDEN OF PROOF AND EVIDENCE STATUS
6100 / m.222/5
6102 / m.64
Summary: the case is related to the negative determination prompt.
The plaintiff,...
T.C.
SUPREME
18. CRIMINAL DEPARTMENT
PRINCIPAL NO: 2015/2372
DECISION NO: 2015/12784
DECISION DATE: 07.12.2015
> C. PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE LAW TO BREAK THE DECISION OF NON-FOLLOW-UP-INSULT AND THREAT-APPROVAL AUTHORITY
Abstract: in the article of request; " Criminal Procedure Law No. 5271 No. 160. "as soon as the public...
T.C SUPREME COURT 16.Legal Department Basis: 2016/ 16646 Decision: 2020 / 234 Decision Date: 10.02.22020
THE DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT
COURT :COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
The court of Cassation asked to review the decision given as a result of the case between the parties; it was understood...
STOPPING EXECUTION WITHIN THE SCOPE OF NOTIFICATIONS RECEIVED ABOUT CORONA VIRUS
Verdict
Corona virus, which is closely followed by the whole world because of a global epidemic, is rapidly
it continues to spread, and as much as it affects social life, it also harms business and business life.
gives....
Zone Limitation And Time Limitation In Terms Of Implementation Of The Decision
In the resolution, it was clearly decided to stop’ nationwide " proceedings and follow-ups.
April March 20, 2020, the date on which the decision was published and entered into force, and until April 30, 2020,...
Execution and non-execution of injunctive Lien
There has long been debate in the doctrine about the nature of injunctive relief. Indeed The Law Is General
In the 2008/12-25 basis 2008/3 decision of the board dated 23.1.2008 County3;
‘For this reason, injunctive relief is not an execution follow-up process,...
Status Of Bankruptcy Proceedings And Concordat Claims
Article 330 of the law No. 2004 does not contain a provision for bankruptcy proceedings, but in the resolution
bankruptcy proceedings were also affected, as well as clear enforcement proceedings. For this reason, until the date 30.04.2020
you can't pursue bankruptcy....