Supreme Court Ruling on Looting Crime - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
17829
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-17829,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

Supreme Court Ruling on Looting Crime

10 Jan Supreme Court Ruling on Looting Crime

Posted at 00:26h in General by
0 Likes

T.C. SUPREME
6.Criminal Department

Basis: 2012/11903
Verdict: 2014/20394
Decision Date: 24.11.2014

CRIME OF LOOTING – WHEN THE VICTIM PUT THE BAG WITH THE MONEY AND CARDS IN THE BAG, WHILE THE DEFENDANT CONTINUED TO PULL THE BAG, THE COMPLAINANT FELL TO THE GROUND AND WAS INJURED TO BE ELIMINATED BY SIMPLE MEDICAL INTERVENTION – THE ACTION WOULD CONSTITUTE THE CRIME OF LOOTING

Summary: According to the occurrence and file content, the complainant was on the market at the time of the incident, and the mobile phone, ………. TL handbag bag put money and cards for a while, did some shopping in the market, a Dec back, squatted on the floor, just wanted to correct you on the bag, in the meantime, the defendant suddenly ran hand in hand in the bag and the bag yakinani received yakinani forced to take this bag back from the hands of the defendant, but the defendant’s bag fell to the ground and continues to take, in the order that yakinani be resolved with simple medical intervention in the face of the understanding that you were injured in a way that will; without regard to the fact that the action would constitute the crime of looting, the provision required breaking.

(5237 P. K. m. 141, 148)

Case and decision: the verdict given by The Local Court was appealed; the file was discussed according to the nature of the application, type of punishment, duration and date of crime:

Occurrence and the contents of the file according to the event in the history of yakinani out of the market for cell phone, $ 250 cash and cards handbag bag, did some shopping in the market for a while, back a Dec squatted on the floor, just wanted to correct you on the bag, in the meantime, the defendant suddenly ran hand in hand in the bag and the bag yakinani received yakinani forced to take this bag back from the hands of the defendant, but the defendant’s bag fell to the ground and continues to take, in the order that yakinani be resolved with simple medical intervention in the face of the understanding that you were injured in a way that will; establishing a written provision without regard to the fact that the action constitutes a crime of looting,

It required a violation, the defendant N. since the appeals of the public prosecutor in this place with your defense were seen in place in this respect, it was decided unanimously on 24.11.2014 that the provision should be violated as a request for the reasons described.

Tags:
, , , ,
No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran