Supreme Court Decision On Compensation - AŞIKOĞLU LAW OFFİCE
Aşıkoğlu started his position as the Alanya Public Prosecutor in 2009 and continued until 2013 when he quit his position to initiate his career as an attorney at law.
alanya,hukuk,bürosu,avukat,dava,danışma,mehmet,aşıkoğlu,mehmet aşıkoğlu,savcı,eski,ceza,ticaret,haciz,alacak,borçlar,Mehemet,Aşıkoğlu,alanya,avukat,hukuk,bürosu,alanya avukat, mehmet aşıkoğlu, alanya hukuk bürosu,Kerim Uysal,Kerem Yağdır,ahmet sezer, mustafa demir, hüsnü sert, jale karakaya, murat aydemir, ayşegül yanmaz
18427
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-18427,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-14.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.13.0,vc_responsive
 

Supreme Court Decision On Compensation

Supreme Court Decision On Compensation

General Assembly of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Turkey basic: 2011 / 280 decision: 2011 / 170 decision date: 15.04.2014

Supreme Court Decision

Court: Ankara 18. The Court Of First Instance

Date: 22/12/2010

Number: 2010/451-2010/457

At the end of the trial due to the “compensation” case between the parties; Ankara 18.Examination of the decision of 05.05.2009 day and 2007/158-2009/154 given by the Court of First Instance on the acceptance of the case from the defendants … Tourism A.P. at the request of his attorney, the Supreme Court 4.03.05.2010 day of the legal department and 2009/9475-2010/5248 at the end of the re-trial, which was broken and turned down instead of the file; the court was resisted in the previous decision.

Appellant: defendant…… A.P. deputy

DECISION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF LAW

After the General Assembly of law examined and read the papers in the file, the requirement was discussed: the defendant’s acting lawyer who appealed the Local Court’s decision to resist 22.12.2010 .. … … power of attorney or authorization is not included in the file.After this deficiency is corrected, the file must be returned to the court for submission to the Supreme Court.

Conclusion: it was unanimously decided on 15.04.2011 to return the file to the court for the completion of the above-written deficiency.

Tags:
, , , ,
No Comments

Post A Comment

GermanTurkeyRussiaFinlandIran